From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:20:33 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/busybox In-Reply-To: <18151015.post@talk.nabble.com> (Daniel Laird's message of "Fri\, 27 Jun 2008 02\:05\:34 -0700 \(PDT\)") References: <20080626065112.3F4CB3C289@busybox.net> <877iccn0ml.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <18151015.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: <87y74ri68u.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Laird writes: Hi, Daniel> I use buildroot actively in my company and have kept up to Daniel> date pretty well. However we are still using busybox 1.2.2.1 Daniel> in some cases. Marking as deprecated is fine, removing Daniel> completely would mean me having to hold local patches to keep Daniel> the ability to upgrade buildroot yet not change busybox Daniel> versions. So you are still doing active development (E.G. buildroot stuff) on a project where you cannot change the busybox version? Daniel> So I vote for not removing just deprecating :-) Ok, anyone still using 1.6 .. 1.8? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard