From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:31:05 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/dbus
In-Reply-To: <20090201055814.GA8215@cloud.net.au> (Hamish Moffatt's message of
	"Sun\, 1 Feb 2009 16\:58\:14 +1100")
References: <20090131225336.4E3377621A@busybox.osuosl.org>
	<20090201055814.GA8215@cloud.net.au>
Message-ID: <87zlh6is7q.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

>>>>> "Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au> writes:

 >> dbus: revert r25194 (Unbreak Peters 'fixes' to dbus for a second time)
 >> 
 >> It was a bogus revert.

 Hamish> Are we having fun yet?

Yeah, I know it's silly.

I know it's mainly a social problem, but to me it again shows the need
from moving from the svn code ghetto approach to git's approach with
patches to the list and finally pull requests to the maintainer.

E.G. get the code reviewed BEFORE it gets into the tree, and not
afterwards.

But let's discuss this after the release.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard