From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:36:36 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot maintainer and stable releases In-Reply-To: <1231355624.32308.410.camel@elrond.atmel.com> (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Wed\, 07 Jan 2009 20\:13\:44 +0100") References: <87prj1v4dy.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1231268529.32308.222.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <87y6xomehq.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1231274947.32308.260.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <87ljtnl5g9.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1231331663.32308.358.camel@elrond.atmel.com> <20090107180208.GA14648@zelow.no> <1231355624.32308.410.camel@elrond.atmel.com> Message-ID: <87zli2kiwr.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: Hi, >> That's what tags, branches and releases are for. >> Having separate makefiles sounds messy. Ulf> I am not an expert in Source Code Management, Ulf> but do you have this capability in Subversion? Ulf> I know you have it in git, but using git Ulf> is apparently not an option. Yes, ofcourse you can do it in svn, and as I said, git is coming. Ulf> I do not see it as too messy to use directories. I do - But more importantly, it would just keep on growing, making it harder and harder to test everything. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard