From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:28:36 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc1 In-Reply-To: <1231255237.32308.111.camel@elrond.atmel.com> (Ulf Samuelsson's message of "Tue\, 06 Jan 2009 16\:20\:37 +0100") References: <20090103000456.97D1E769FA@busybox.osuosl.org> <87iqosqz0z.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <1231255237.32308.111.camel@elrond.atmel.com> Message-ID: <87zli4o3mj.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson writes: ulf> Provide factory default command to u-boot, using Buildroot variables >> ulf> Added: ulf> trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc1/u-boot-2009.01-rc1-009-factory.patch >> >> Do we really need this? What's the upstream status of it? Ulf> I find that this patch reduces maintenance A LOT. Ulf> If someone calls in with a problem loading linux, Ulf> then you tell them to do "factory" and then Ulf> everything is SO much easier. But what's the difference between this command and a factory environment variable which just erases your environment and resets the board? If you really need it for Atmel stuff, maybe you should keep it in the Atmel fork? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard