From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: oprofile
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:08:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zlrj2khz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080424165429.5E3993C7F0@busybox.net> (ninevoltz@uclibc.org's message of "Thu\, 24 Apr 2008 09\:54\:29 -0700 \(PDT\)")
>>>>> "ninevoltz" == ninevoltz <ninevoltz@uclibc.org> writes:
ninevoltz> Author: ninevoltz
ninevoltz> Date: 2008-04-24 09:54:29 -0700 (Thu, 24 Apr 2008)
ninevoltz> New Revision: 21847
ninevoltz> Log:
ninevoltz> add oprofile
ninevoltz> Added:
ninevoltz> trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/
ninevoltz> trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/Config.in
ninevoltz> trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/oprofile-0.9.3-avr32.patch
Please use the .patch.avr32 naming convention.
ninevoltz> Added: trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/Config.in
ninevoltz> ===================================================================
ninevoltz> --- trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/Config.in (rev 0)
ninevoltz> +++ trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/Config.in 2008-04-24 16:54:29 UTC (rev 21847)
ninevoltz> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
ninevoltz> +config BR2_PACKAGE_OPROFILE
ninevoltz> + bool "oprofile"
ninevoltz> + default n
ninevoltz> + select BR2_PACKAGE_POPT
ninevoltz> + select BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP
Does that actually work? I mean, does the compiler get recompiled with
C++ support if you select this package after your initial make?
If not, we should make it a depends instead.
ninevoltz> + OProfile leverages the hardware performance counters of the
ninevoltz> + CPU to enable profiling of a wide variety of interesting
ninevoltz> + statistics, which can also be used for basic time-spent
ninevoltz> + profiling. All code is profiled: hardware and software
ninevoltz> + interrupt handlers, kernel modules, the kernel, shared
ninevoltz> + libraries, and applications.
Trailing space.
ninevoltz> --- trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/oprofile-fix-autoconf-brain-damage.patch (rev 0)
ninevoltz> +++ trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/oprofile-fix-autoconf-brain-damage.patch 2008-04-24 16:54:29 UTC (rev 21847)
ninevoltz> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
ninevoltz> +diff --git a/libutil++/bfd_support.cpp b/libutil++/bfd_support.cpp
ninevoltz> +index a33836f..9b0d1b2 100644
ninevoltz> +--- a/libutil++/bfd_support.cpp
ninevoltz> ++++ b/libutil++/bfd_support.cpp
ninevoltz> +@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ void bfd_info::close()
ninevoltz> + }
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +-#if SYNTHESIZE_SYMBOLS
ninevoltz> ++#if SYNTHESIZE_SYMBOLS && 0
What does this fix?
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_DIR := $(BUILD_DIR)/oprofile-$(OPROFILE_VERSION)
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_SITE := http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/oprofile
$(BR2_SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR).dl.sourceforge.net ?
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_SOURCE := oprofile-$(OPROFILE_VERSION).tar.gz
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_CAT := $(ZCAT)
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_BINARIES := utils/ophelp
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_BINARIES += pp/opannotate pp/oparchive pp/opgprof pp/opreport
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_BINARIES += daemon/oprofiled
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(DL_DIR)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE):
ninevoltz> + $(WGET) -P $(DL_DIR) $(OPROFILE_SITE)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE)
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +oprofile-source: $(DL_DIR)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE)
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(OPROFILE_DIR)/.unpacked: $(DL_DIR)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE)
ninevoltz> + $(OPROFILE_CAT) $(DL_DIR)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE) | tar -C $(BUILD_DIR) $(TAR_OPTIONS) -
ninevoltz> + toolchain/patch-kernel.sh $(OPROFILE_DIR) package/oprofile/ \*.patch*
ninevoltz> + $(CONFIG_UPDATE) $(OPROFILE_DIR)
ninevoltz> + touch $@
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(OPROFILE_DIR)/.configured: $(OPROFILE_DIR)/.unpacked
ninevoltz> + (cd $(OPROFILE_DIR); rm -f config.cache; \
ninevoltz> + $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) \
ninevoltz> + $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_ARGS) \
ninevoltz> + ./configure \
ninevoltz> + --target=$(GNU_TARGET_NAME) \
ninevoltz> + --host=$(GNU_TARGET_NAME) \
ninevoltz> + --build=$(GNU_HOST_NAME) \
ninevoltz> + --prefix=/usr \
ninevoltz> + --sysconfdir=/etc \
ninevoltz> + --localstatedir=/var \
ninevoltz> + --includedir=/include \
ninevoltz> + );
ninevoltz> + touch $@
Why not use AUTOTOOLS?
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(OPROFILE_DIR)/daemon/oprofiled: $(OPROFILE_DIR)/.configured
ninevoltz> + PATH=$(TARGET_PATH) $(MAKE) -C $(OPROFILE_DIR)
ninevoltz> + touch -c $@
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/oprofiled: $(OPROFILE_DIR)/daemon/oprofiled
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/oprofile/avr32
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(addprefix $(OPROFILE_DIR)/events/avr32/, events unit_masks) $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/oprofile/avr32
avr32?
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(OPROFILE_DIR)/libregex/stl.pat $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/oprofile
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(OPROFILE_DIR)/utils/opcontrol $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(addprefix $(OPROFILE_DIR)/, $(OPROFILE_BINARIES)) $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin
ninevoltz> + $(STRIP) --strip-unneeded $(addprefix $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/, $(notdir $(OPROFILE_BINARIES)))
ninevoltz> + touch -c $@
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +oprofile: uclibc popt binutils_target $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/oprofiled
Doesn't it need popt at configure time?
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-24 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-24 16:54 [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: oprofile ninevoltz at uclibc.org
2008-04-24 18:08 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2008-04-24 18:20 ` John Voltz
2008-04-24 18:46 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-04-24 19:04 ` John Voltz
2008-04-25 8:17 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-04-25 6:48 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-04-25 8:09 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-04-25 8:18 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-04-25 8:36 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-04-25 8:21 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zlrj2khz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk \
--to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox