From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Laird Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 01:59:38 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: cairo dillo libgtk12 libgtk2 metacity p etc... In-Reply-To: <20070204194743.5047748658@busybox.net> References: <20070204194743.5047748658@busybox.net> Message-ID: <8803519.post@talk.nabble.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net aldot wrote: > > Author: aldot > Date: 2007-02-04 11:47:41 -0800 (Sun, 04 Feb 2007) > New Revision: 17769 > > Log: > - the $(XSERVER) target can be provided by different X server impls. > Adjust users > - rdesktop needs an xserver impl > > > Modified: > trunk/buildroot/package/Makefile.in > trunk/buildroot/package/cairo/cairo.mk > trunk/buildroot/package/dillo/dillo.mk > trunk/buildroot/package/libgtk12/libgtk12.mk > trunk/buildroot/package/libgtk2/libgtk2.mk > trunk/buildroot/package/metacity/metacity.mk > trunk/buildroot/package/pango/pango.mk > trunk/buildroot/package/rdesktop/rdesktop.mk > trunk/buildroot/package/rxvt/rxvt.mk > trunk/buildroot/package/xorg/xorg.mk > > ... > Cool, I posted a thread the other day about how to deal with packages that could be configured with X and without X(in the case where you use DirectFB for example) I presume we could add a DirectFB option to the list of XSERVERS: (as there is a DirectFB Xserver) Secondly, Would you also have anything against if XSERVERS empty then configure packages as --without-x (or equivalent) Then we could also check if DirectFB then use --enable-directfb for packages that care. What do you think. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/svn-commit%3A-trunk-buildroot-package%3A-cairo-dillo-libgtk12-libgtk2-metacity-p-etc...-tf3171054.html#a8803519 Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.