From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:34:28 -0700 Subject: [Buildroot] ebtables and musl In-Reply-To: References: <20200613132317.4edb7676@gmx.net> <20200613144325.6c88eb8d@gmx.net> <87lfkqe4hk.fsf@tarshish> Message-ID: <8843cd27-6553-986e-92d5-e210a3f678f0@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 6/13/2020 8:34 PM, Markus Mayer wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 20:00, Baruch Siach wrote: >> >> Hi Markus, >> >> On Sat, Jun 13 2020, Markus Mayer wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 05:43, Peter Seiderer wrote: >>>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:10:28 -0700, Markus Mayer wrote: >>>>>> While we are on the topic of ebtables, why is buildroot still using >>>>>> v2.0.10-4 from 2014 when there is 2.0.11 from 2019 (as per >>>>>> http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/ebtables/)? Is it just a matter of >>>>>> submitting a patch to update it or is there an underlying reason to >>>>>> keep the old version around? >>>>> >>>>> Probably not, care to send an ebtables update patch? >>> >>> Sure. I'll send a patch. >> >> We have a version upgrade patch in patchwork: >> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20200427212653.29933-1-ryanbarnett3 at gmail.com/ >> >> You might want to test and contribute your Tested-by. > > Will do. I'll let you know how it goes. Would not these two patches be relevant for the kernel headers too: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=da360299b6734135a5f66d7db458dcc7801c826a https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6926e041a8920c8ec27e4e155efa760aa01551fd which would not require patching ebtables or musl at all? -- Florian