From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Lindahl Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Buildroot] base busybox version for buildroot? In-Reply-To: <200607312012.48613.rob@landley.net> References: <20060727183737.GB23639@codepoet.org> <200607312012.48613.rob@landley.net> Message-ID: <9aa77677255835d7244f93dc4ed4b2f9@bowery.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 27 July 2006 2:37 pm, Erik Andersen wrote: >> On Thu Jul 27, 2006 at 09:44:42AM -0400, Drew Cohan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is the base busybox version for buildroot is now 1.2.0, instead of >>> 1.1.3? Is there a buildroot config somewhere that determines which >>> version of busybox is used, or is it just based on the date of the >>> buildroot package (builds after 30 June 2006 use busybox 1.2.0)? >>> There seems to have been a file size change recently, just curious >>> what that might have been: >>> >>> buildroot-20060710.t..> 10-Jul-2006 00:17 3.8M >>> buildroot-20060711.t..> 11-Jul-2006 00:17 4.3M >> >> It probably makes sense at this point to have configurable >> busybox versions (as with gcc and binuitls) with a specific >> default config for each. > > I still think the latest release version is all you need, but what do I > know? :) > If you're building an embedded system you definitely want control over the version... so you can freeze it once everything works, and ship it! :) just my $0.002 Marc