[Buildroot] [PATCH] x11vnc: update to 0.9.14

[Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>]

Hi Martin,

On 24/04/17 13:27, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> On 2017-04-24 14:22, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
>> This uses x11vnc's new upstream location, github, via https. Autoreconf is
>> added, because it's really only a code snapshot release.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@ginzinger.com>
>> ---
>>  package/x11vnc/x11vnc.hash | 2 +-
>>  package/x11vnc/x11vnc.mk   | 9 +++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/package/x11vnc/x11vnc.hash b/package/x11vnc/x11vnc.hash
>> index 5828b12..0da7765 100644
>> --- a/package/x11vnc/x11vnc.hash
>> +++ b/package/x11vnc/x11vnc.hash
>> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
>>  # Locally computed:
>> -sha256  f6829f2e629667a5284de62b080b13126a0736499fe47cdb447aedb07a59f13b  x11vnc-0.9.13.tar.gz
>> +sha256  45f87c5e4382988c73e8c7891ac2bfb45d8f9ce1196ae06651c84636684ea143  0.9.14.tar.gz
> 
> 
> It's ugly to have 0.9.14.tar.gz. Is there a buildroot-style solution to
> this?

This is just fine, it's not the only package whose tarball name doesn't
include the package name. Look for instance the mpv and yaffs2utils
packages.

> 
> And other than that, is there a reason why x11vnc had not been updated
> before? 0.9.14 is one and a half years old.

Because nobody did it, probably. Anyway, the 0.9.14 is considered a
bleeding edge development release (according to x11vnc's website) and
even with that, as you said, is one and a half years old. Just
wondering..., shouldn't be better to go with ToT (top of the tree) instead?

X11VNC_VERSION = e47d922d4a4d980f8dce3e466c73dc4665e4bc01
X11VNC_SITE = $(call github,LibVNC,x11vnc,$(X11VNC_VERSION))

Regards,

Vincent

> 
> thanks
> 
>                        martin
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>