From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Samuelsson Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:28:20 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package/gettext References: <20080723103550.70E8B3C7D7@busybox.net><20080723134217.GC27147@cloud.net.au> <20080723142318.GA27902@mx.loc> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:42:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >>On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0700, jacmet at uclibc.org wrote: > >>Personally I think the shared build_$(ARCH) is just wrong with multiple >>projects. I might hack my local copy to define BUILD_DIR to match >>PROJECT_BUILD_DIR to fix this. > > The project thing as it is now should not have been applied in the first > place. It's misguided and not thought through, let alone implemented > properly. Nothing new. Dead horse. The project "thing" will allow you to experiment with different kernels, using a single toolchain You can select to include or not include a package, but if you use the package, it has to have the same options in each project. Patches that will move packages with buildroot options to project_build_$(ARCH) will of course improve the functionality. If you do not like the project feature, you can always use separate buildroot trees. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson