From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 180E4C46CA1 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F7141797; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:26:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 94F7141797 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoM1ig5rVOMt; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBC24176F; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:26:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 9EBC24176F Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4BE1BF5A8 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392A94176F for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:26:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 392A94176F X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kU29APhvy1tl for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from helium.openadk.org (helium.openadk.org [IPv6:2a00:1828:2000:679::23]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F5C4174F for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:26:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 44F5C4174F Received: by helium.openadk.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCBB6352BDF9; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:26:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:26:39 +0200 From: Waldemar Brodkorb To: "Yann E. MORIN" Message-ID: References: <20230917130023.GX415981@scaer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230917130023.GX415981@scaer> X-Operating-System: Linux 5.10.0-21-amd64 x86_64 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openadk.org; s=2022; t=1695025599; bh=loZqmJ2C/Bq5mYky24I5H2UKMW32KOGsoMOrNq+810w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=v8F9i4eTuiTz53fAwZUy4EyW/y3IS/6X+U7GZiqJ/xhr6IryOQ72dJ+N1BpmV/oIL 2cX2JQAr7Gq4WxgmpMgiuFZT+1guY1P+8pi50dmkMF3BkScOnSPmRt/zWuEb9WG3nC Y/mnLxesQnEnxkDfz9Cw/oNztUumVS/YwoJ6z7RTWh9fj0bwqXNzB+fks1g7E2T9pt DU1VvTAc8tP3Aw5F9ORzmJI36VXIoV94nBjTQij3Hi/NLhugKE7rZJd2jET63ziJdx 7kTNd9Lv/kb+JCPl3eNvqqgaMDWhWsW457xrr/Zw8/v0SekvG++TLzqwUTxtGMKtqU jJKBDa1kl4yJg== Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] ruby: bump version to 3.2.2 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi Yann, all, Yann E. MORIN wrote, > On 2023-09-16 14:20 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb spake thusly: > > Patch is included upstream, remove it and the reference in .checkpackageignore. > > > > Host build fails with following error: > > :85:in `require': cannot load such file -- psych (LoadError) > > from :85:in `require' > > from /buildroot/output/build/host-ruby-3.2.2/lib/rubygems.rb:608:in `load_yaml' > > > > Fix it by adding host-libyaml to the dependencies. > > > > Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb > > --- > > v1->v2: > > - add failure for host build requested by Thomas Petazzoni > > You provided the error message of the build failure for the host > variant, that explains why host-ruby needs host-libyaml. That's good. > > But I think that what Thomas requested, was to explain why the target > variant does not need libyaml. > > Indeed, it looks like host-ruby is trying to load libyaml at runtime, > so it would kinda make sense that it would also need it at runtime on > the target... > > A runtime test would be great, and would resolve the issue. ;-) I sent an runtime test to the list. THis show that ruby should work without libyaml on the target. It is an optional feature for the target. best regards Waldemar _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot