Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: louis.chauvet@bootlin.com, Buildroot List <buildroot@buildroot.org>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Config.in: change default optimization level from -Os to -O2
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 18:32:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYxfxXC4-vKZlmcZ@landeda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231227165840.2900718-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

Thomas, All,

On 2023-12-27 17:58 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot spake thusly:
> Historically, Buildroot has defaulted to -Os as the gcc optimization
> flags. However, this default is probably not the most appropriate
> anymore, and this commit therefore changes the default to -O2.
> 
> Here are some arguments in favor of this change:
> 
> - Most Buildroot uses use Buildroot for platforms that have a

s/uses/users/ maybe?

>   reasonable amount of storage, and the difference between -Os and -O2
>   in terms of code size is no longer than significant compared to the

s/than/as/

>   size of storage typically available on average embedded Linux
>   devices

... nowadays.

> - -Os can have a pretty bad performance impact, compared to -O2.

What impact are we speaking of? Basically, -Os is -O2 except for
optimisations that increase code size. Also, smaller code fit better
in caches, so there can be a speed gain to have smaller code too.

So, stating that -Os has a "pretty bad" performance impact is not that
obvious.

But otherwise, I agree that, -Os does not bring much size gain, compared
to storage of devices nowadays, so, except for those little nits:

Acked-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

> - -Os is much less widely tested than -O2. For example, with recent
>    versions of gcc, there are parts of Qt5 that segfault when compiled
>    with -Os and work perfectly fine with -O2. Yes, it's a compiler bug
>    that should be fixed, but in the mean time, having a default that's
>    more widely used/tested makes sense.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  Config.in | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Config.in b/Config.in
> index 554b4062eb..c38b1e6454 100644
> --- a/Config.in
> +++ b/Config.in
> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ config BR2_STRIP_EXCLUDE_DIRS
>  
>  choice
>  	prompt "gcc optimization level"
> -	default BR2_OPTIMIZE_S
> +	default BR2_OPTIMIZE_2
>  	help
>  	  Set the optimization level for gcc
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot@buildroot.org
> https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-27 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-27 16:58 [Buildroot] [PATCH] Config.in: change default optimization level from -Os to -O2 Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2023-12-27 17:32 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2024-01-02  8:39   ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZYxfxXC4-vKZlmcZ@landeda \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    --cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
    --cc=louis.chauvet@bootlin.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox