From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52661C47073 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0743D615D6; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 0743D615D6 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XiFnKZC-s_Rw; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547956158D; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:34:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 547956158D Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADDA1BF414 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BF742E27 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:34:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org A0BF742E27 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kc-auy7db9q1 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5E7842E26 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:34:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org B5E7842E26 Received: from ymorin.is-a-geek.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb19:8290:3800:4f89:5708:1633:580e]) (Authenticated sender: yann.morin.1998@free.fr) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53774B005A6; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:34:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by ymorin.is-a-geek.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 22:34:34 +0100 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:34:34 +0100 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: References: <20240103102311.4048759-1-abrodkin@synopsys.com> <20240104221941.044adcb5@windsurf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240104221941.044adcb5@windsurf> X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1704404080; bh=h+aiWvFLoos8/KnjFEtq1G4Gsz0A+UJz+dWv4TYkW7U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fpO8Pbqgd8u8HsnL6HM00qIFzuU3GOM389Uvspdj7+OpBMJBVl34x134EhrF6jLiw tTzt0OO0+UOvL4uaVSkF7YMnD5ofbP5FBySJ+MzR6qrL+Y6rPwSH7LNW5fxx78WQ4g WGxwmZBLCdEKWWgFAUfnpG//8YgfWbN8DVLi0lSdx2l3g8Cb78wD/M4jXOQSKixV3x djPEvRF+ZaCrCLUBlhWofyn0CU/ZJ5fSStPSgju5h/pPpUj3LqevMoaB93VbA5Yjj9 an3XMGZN3CguNwwdACJcG/gnNuSI09RzUmBNHZSp/Hkx21+MSa1fAD9E/dmtVXKEHq uZ+Ld/k4sjZyA== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=smtp-20201208 header.b=fpO8Pbqg Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] arch: Set max/common-page-size for libgcc & libstdc++ X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexey Brodkin , Pavel Kozlov , Vladimir Isaev , Alexey Brodkin via buildroot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Thomas, Alexey, All, On 2024-01-04 22:19 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 02:23:11 -0800 > Alexey Brodkin via buildroot wrote: > > I would agree that it gets more and more ugly, but so far I cannot see > > any more elegant solution. So if there're suggestions how to improve, > > let's discuss. [--SNIP--] > But I'm surprised they are not needed also in the C library build. Why > are you not seeing the same problem with the C library build, it should > also need the same page size flags, doesn't it? It is my understanding that the toolchain wrapper is installed as a post initial gcc hook as well: package/gcc/gcc-initial/gcc-initial.mk: 59 HOST_GCC_INITIAL_POST_BUILD_HOOKS += TOOLCHAIN_WRAPPER_BUILD 60 HOST_GCC_INITIAL_POST_INSTALL_HOOKS += TOOLCHAIN_WRAPPER_INSTALL 61 HOST_GCC_INITIAL_POST_INSTALL_HOOKS += HOST_GCC_INSTALL_WRAPPER_AND_SIMPLE_SYMLINKS So the C libraries are built using our wrapper. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot