From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB66CA0EFF for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 05:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E554B80A87; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 05:00:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id KWVhc2ykvuA3; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 05:00:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 1A38580A84 Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A38580A84; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 05:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBF869 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 05:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366F940058 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 05:00:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id bEPw26G8LIrc for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 05:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=89.238.66.15; helo=helium.openadk.org; envelope-from=wbx@openadk.org; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp2.osuosl.org 22F274000B DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 22F274000B Received: from helium.openadk.org (helium.openadk.org [89.238.66.15]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F274000B for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 05:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by helium.openadk.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5CA63520516; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:00:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:00:11 +0200 From: Waldemar Brodkorb To: Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: References: <20250829170522.2436314-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20250829235155.721a4774@windsurf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250829235155.721a4774@windsurf> X-Operating-System: Linux 6.1.0-38-amd64 x86_64 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openadk.org; s=2022; t=1756530012; bh=vjaXYAQMbRKgKHMZIWhGBWil8T3ydKnNoDa90vhYOhA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DeAt+0Gdei+d0MmqQZPJPBxsV9BjOIUHSH+M8W3SvFiMcr9j4wHkea83BEpqp8KeP 0Urhhd1/vKNLQX8SrEC7hBy7bqjcPBFxBUTyVaX1WlkY/bdsmy0N0lSX0mp+b1pFS3 N6I0dy6yIE2ssjENOXtZo98689CunuoMNo0V9ZdIQEX5RySl/628sS8/7UaYuCb8rH KBBn5jAVvxiSjh5hYCXzbMgG/irUsqUzgays9AS6s5+Cjn8lxOI5FxbBJVij7+tlCQ bsZ6ALcNvVZXm5UTcrgyg9Ryg8xL4QoSzpJDTy3YhzAon/z6XWOQpWCbAWW/e1lgKk YXc08A4S0luZw== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=openadk.org X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=openadk.org header.i=@openadk.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2022 header.b=DeAt+0Gd Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/asterisk: fix build caused by libjwt bump X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi Thomas, Thomas Petazzoni wrote, > On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 22:47:39 +0200 > Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > > > Waldemar: you did the bump of libjwt. Are you using this library? > > > Independently of Asterisk? > > > > No, I am fine with that change. > > Sorry, but that doesn't really answer my question. You are both the > maintainer of package/libjwt and package/asterisk, and you bumped > package/libjwt, which is only used by package/asterisk, without testing > that it doesn't break asterisk. That is not true. I tested it. At least a basic test as always: buildroot$ git checkout f11b9db0b5f150d73e10a0c25989e2ec6300588e buildroot$ make raspberrypi5_defconfig buildroot$ make menuconfig <- choose asterisk buildroot$ make buildroot$ file output/target/usr/sbin/asterisk output/target/usr/sbin/asterisk: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1, for GNU/Linux 3.7.0, stripped buildroot$ ./output/host/bin/aarch64-linux-gcc --version aarch64-linux-gcc.br_real (Buildroot 2021.11-12449-g1bef613319) 13.3.0 The reason for the failures might be a newer gcc. > Now that asterisk uses a bundled libjwt, do we need to keep the > separate libjwt package? No, for me it is okay to use the bundled one and remove the separate package. best regards Waldemar _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot