From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA17DD4661C for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0B38478E; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id nWlhWrH916k1; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org BE30284792 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=buildroot.org; s=default; t=1768506460; bh=/NDtCWm9XuZ9ud6ZLASPvqWsjPE9Omtls2SaJG6qtSo=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=LtkM/WjuGLcSDe5wggFNeLrAP0cUqxnVefghLhsaEe3L5vPfz2Evv2eGZ2paoixRf 2gD1doWfHxXxYLxLj4ncW0cuboEo80DvjgPiWVyBjtVdZlSLLQlq+aN7x0xTyB1wi3 21Xq3oUxgdZ4OzYni4qIspGe1ZcXMB7FLMXoSFP3kwe2RqnbHsnZ4UkCeMIbePNx4T drR66lAM5kkmVsx/xGYY84i5fhAWlOeaAjMSveoOSs1LXCbY7Oe849IYB3LScCCbSl TgyshcIVCxXsj+nTFp5p8w9004sYn3+9d8KPr/CsYEZyynSojj/yGckr1nawozH4ZW AB89Nyf9TDKkg== Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE30284792; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AE0223 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CE884792 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id zTm0dfT8edI4 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=185.246.85.4; helo=smtpout-03.galae.net; envelope-from=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp1.osuosl.org 8B4FD8478E DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 8B4FD8478E Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4FD8478E for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D0334E420F1; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E036606E0; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 891CC10B687EE; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 20:47:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 20:47:33 +0100 To: Petr Vorel Cc: Julien Olivain via buildroot , Julien Olivain Message-ID: References: <20251221180810.3770181-1-ju.o@free.fr> <20251228232021.4d4e70c9@windsurf> <20251230174958.GA496221@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251230174958.GA496221@pevik> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1768506455; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=RQgIG5wHY107kk5016DNRUqJ9XltDGjd95jDimeqQdM=; b=dUG+4ZhiroXSu1MDwNZv0igoGWJGU46vuTw7aVgP40lr70/0hAiVssdgN9r8bkmRdOPrsL 2SoSA4ki6VHclSoXc1Ml7daiOBdtL0KFJCd1t7xTfxkIuDo9bh/qhh4et8qhP0sebLVO2S oU9ZnUPNhMrMFKjimaKoOyEJcKC7YxjUsqg89JLmUg25sSIxjZqbkz28g9n6IDZJmtkbGV /EWoF8hBsgjN9K4ReK3zxBMHFyqEZlPfspIrWnuI5fxzhfBbpUJfLKTxdHmEia9EEntil9 zqN0VaJg6W/8B4tliwGZZKyfD6JJIn5X6tL0ezDqUOlVioBiro9QE/tEt4DH7w== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=dUG+4Zhi Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] support/testing: ltp-testsuite: replace runltp by kirk X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello, On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 06:49:58PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote: > Yeah. I don't like it either. Specially LTP tests themselves does not require > anything (single test is either binary written in C statically linked LTP > libraries, we also have few POSIX compatible shell based tests which require > barely minimum of external dependencies), it can be run as is. > > ATM we have list of tests in so called runtest files [1], which contain list of > tests (each line is single test: "test_label binary/script optional_arguments"), > therefore anything which can remove the first parameter and execute the rest can > be LTP runner. i.e. Buildroot custom script could be really minimal. I don't think I would want Buildroot to carry its own custom script for this. > runltp does quite a few other things but these who need them should really move > to kirk. Also we plan to implement in kirk and ltx running tests in parallel. > That will save a lot of runtime. > > [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/tree/master/runtest > > > One option would as suggested by Petr to use kirk in its intended mode, > > with kirk running on the host, and connected over SSH to the target to > > run tests. > > > On the other hand, it was a lot more simple/convenient to be able to > > just run a simple shell script on the target to run the test suite. > > Would it be possible to have both? Vendor runltp for local use and package kirk > as a host package (+ ltx as normal package)? I'm not sure what you're suggesting as "both"? Do you mean, having a simple test runner that we can run directly on the target, but also offer the possibility of building/installing kirk to run the test suite from the host? I'm not sure what ltx is in this context. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot