From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA73AC61DE1 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74FE405D0; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:28:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id mqqwrs02vXnt; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:28:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=buildroot.org; s=default; t=1788110907; bh=W5y8xdmQpPSn6aJORMkh7AttwEdE9jFfZr4FFY3atlw=; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc:From; b=JqWKxGO1FVV2wUdzszOUOFNQLrTY5+bwIyiZs/InDi8s7n8231HXmXxTBFbJOGIYt 8Ex1trGec2Y3uCQIIAc9wXiLCsS8dz9D6nAKSObRCca8z3J9Nr8+f8Kh8Xl6kOp2Xn sGnn8zkOPehmV5RGyeZMpkR4PVPpXxxt+m6BsZ3xHWv1puB1j78J5rNNxhOg9JxbNX 6Ecixy37tG5ivVkMws3/1/asKSA0Wy/xs9lhPHeL5izREzmFcH5u7fKIx4irpcIMr9 ohPUvdHhJi+Iy+4qKEbOZEQwVgkteoSC246xjJyWG2OtI5X3rKb7WFmj9rDRii0qHY AUgy/yvS53X3w== Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1646405AE; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435FF23E for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351A2809CE for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:28:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id GLrzzhsbS3X2 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=89.238.66.15; helo=helium.openadk.org; envelope-from=wbx@openadk.org; receiver= Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=openadk.org Received: from helium.openadk.org (helium.openadk.org [89.238.66.15]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CC3809B3 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:28:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openadk.org; s=2022; t=1788110902; bh=eVHtympgpjlWipzKVbKHhPy/lDMC5dUiIvDEhIDVo8o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=udF967wzc6S/BDkBmhYefqf5gDmDQ38D1MkNrVKbUnNNABuwgF0e8LkipcWe6Xecn r0fg/uZ7DhejV0WYoV8RyDQyUVIRB58ieYiH4U5gjgD/JlEh0NU62ooZ/kDIUjyRqM L3PTdBmzdGtueI+E0vkBTgj38aNRAOM5QKenStrSygIf5xNvG9+MhzMGLXwPq2iZUs Mpi53Y48YeZxJ/pbEzYnjDN4q2LUX1DsAoja0Do8AMhcWFzoLTfSdSrTxiDmVkygfk gfbLxdfEFOMGQv28Is6jTJ0sIOEju0vnpzh3A/exID/vgO0lfYKq8Hkuwjr7oU/D3x aWMl5TCiwpPHg== Received: by helium.openadk.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5620631E0D8B; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:28:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:28:21 +0200 From: Waldemar Brodkorb To: Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 6.12.96+deb13-amd64 x86_64 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] arch/or1k: fix uClibc issues with fenv enabled X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi Thomas, Thomas Petazzoni wrote, > Hello, > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 01:39:26PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > But more importantly, I don't see how your patch fixes the soft float > > situation. My understanding is that soft-float is the default on > > OR1K. Your patch doesn't change *anything* in soft-float > > configuration, it only passes -mhard-float in hard float > > configurations, and makes hard float the default. > > > > How can your patch fix anything with BR2_OR1K_SOFT_FLOAT enabled? > > Sorry for my mistake, but re-reading, I know understand: > BR2_OR1K_SOFT_FLOAT selects BR2_SOFT_FLOAT, and based on that uClibc > uses or doesn't use hard-float fenv stuff. That makes sense. > > Still the patch seems incorrect to me, and should modify gcc.mk and > the toolchain external stuff instead. As I stated in my other mail --with-float is not available for gcc on or1k. How should I proceed? How does the toolchain-wrapper recognizes the user wants a hard-float toolchain? For the external toolchains I understand it, but not for the internal BR toolchains. best regards Waldemar _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot