From: bugzilla at busybox.net <bugzilla@busybox.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [Bug 11996] opencv3 SIGILL on Cortex-A5 with VFPv4-D16
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 22:20:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-11996-163-RZL0JFcsXR@https.bugs.busybox.net/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-11996-163@https.bugs.busybox.net/>
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11996
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> ---
So, I did a bit more research on this, but couldn't come to a useful
conclusion. The handling of CPU optimizations in opencv3 is complicated.
ENABLE_VFPV3 and ENABLE_NEON seem to be obsolete options, but the replacement
CPU_BASELINE is not very clear.
With a VFPv3-D16 case, I get:
-- CPU/HW features:
-- Baseline:
-- requested: DETECT
-- disabled: VFPV3 NEON
which is quite expected.
When NEON is enabled as the FPU, I get:
-- CPU/HW features:
-- Baseline: NEON
-- requested: DETECT
-- disabled: VFPV3 NEON
So NEON seems to be detected, but it's also listed in the "disabled"
features... which doesn't make a lot of sense.
Then, if I use VFPv3 as the FPU, I get:
-- CPU/HW features:
-- Baseline:
-- requested: DETECT
-- disabled: VFPV3 NEON
I.e, it doesn't detect that I have VFPv3.
(Of course the tests above are after removing ENABLE_VFPV3/ENABLE_NEON).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-27 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-01 17:17 [Buildroot] [Bug 11996] New: opencv3 SIGILL on Cortex-A5 with VFPv4-D16 bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-07-01 21:47 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 11996] " bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-11-27 22:20 ` bugzilla at busybox.net [this message]
2020-02-05 16:49 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-11996-163-RZL0JFcsXR@https.bugs.busybox.net/ \
--to=bugzilla@busybox.net \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox