From: bugzilla@busybox.net
To: buildroot@uclibc.org
Subject: [Buildroot] [Bug 14796] 64 bit time and seccomp conflict (OpenSSH server crash)
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 13:06:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14796-163-SDgXeXYLLg@https.bugs.busybox.net/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14796-163@https.bugs.busybox.net/>
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14796
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> ---
Peter Korsgaard and I finally had a look at this today, and we think we finally
understand what is going on.
glibc does not care about the kernel headers when deciding whether to use the
clock_gettime64() syscall or not: it always use it, and if that fails at
runtime, it falls back to clock_gettime(). This is how glibc ends up using
clock_gettime64() even if your kernel does not support it.
On the other hand, the OpenSSL seccomp code relies on kernel headers to decide
whether the clock_gettime64() syscall should be in the allowed list of syscalls
or not.
So when you are in a situation where glibc is recent, but your kernel is older,
you get into precisely the problem you have: glibc tries to use
clock_gettime64, but OpenSSH seccomp configuration prevents that, which does
not allow glibc to gracefully fallback to clock_gettime.
The only solution that we see is to disable seccomp support in OpenSSH. Peter
will send a patch for this. I will keep this bug open until this patch is
posted and hopefully merged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-18 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 6:54 [Buildroot] [Bug 14796] New: 64 bit time and seccomp conflict (OpenSSH server crash) bugzilla
2022-09-18 13:06 ` bugzilla [this message]
2022-09-18 15:06 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 14796] " bugzilla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-14796-163-SDgXeXYLLg@https.bugs.busybox.net/ \
--to=bugzilla@busybox.net \
--cc=buildroot@uclibc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox