Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] package/libdispatch: add fix for 32-bit arm

[Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>]

  Hi Alsey,

  This patch should be included in the first one.

On 29/03/2022 20:50, Alsey Coleman Miller wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alsey Coleman Miller <alseycmiller@gmail.com>
> ---
>   package/libdispatch/arm-yield.patch | 13 +++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 package/libdispatch/arm-yield.patch
> 
> diff --git a/package/libdispatch/arm-yield.patch b/package/libdispatch/arm-yield.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..fa7cf7cce4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/libdispatch/arm-yield.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@

  Patches should be git formatted. They should have a full commit message that 
explains the issue, and a Signed-off-by. There should also be an upstream 
reference, or something like "Not applicable" and an explaantion why it's not 
applicable for upstream.

  Regards,
  Arnout


> +diff --git a/src/shims/yield.c b/src/shims/yield.c
> +index 43f0017..d0c5fff 100644
> +--- a/src/shims/yield.c
> ++++ b/src/shims/yield.c
> +@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ void *
> + _dispatch_wait_for_enqueuer(void **ptr)
> + {
> + #if !DISPATCH_HW_CONFIG_UP
> +-#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__arm64__)
> ++#if (defined(__arm__) && defined(__APPLE__)) || defined(__arm64__)
> + 	int spins = DISPATCH_WAIT_SPINS_WFE;
> + 	void *value;
> + 	while (unlikely(spins-- > 0)) {
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot