Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugs at busybox.net <bugs@busybox.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [buildroot 0001287]: posix_memalign() declared but not implemented
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:57:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c252918fb0930b5ef0f0253ac098985f@busybox.net> (raw)


The following issue has been set as DUPLICATE OF issue 0001275. 
====================================================================== 
http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=1287 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                Franck78
Assigned To:                buildroot
====================================================================== 
Project:                    buildroot
Issue ID:                   1287
Category:                   Standards Compliance
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   block
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             03-24-2007 12:15 PDT
Last Modified:              03-24-2007 12:57 PDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    posix_memalign() declared but not implemented
Description: 
Hello,
For a reason totally ununderstandable for me, 'Vapier' made a correction
19 months ago to uClibc and this correction is not present in latest
uClibc release (0.9.28.3) Why such a delay.....

The facts:
posix_memalign() function is declared in header file (stdlib.h)
posix_memalign() is implemented nowhere

=>compilations run smoothly
=>linking final application sucks (of course)
For example try 'parted version 1.8.2'

Either the function is present or not. But half done job is idiot.
Provided patch to drop in "buildroot/toolchain/uClibc"
to implement the function in next snapshot.

Thank you for read (and fixing).

======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
duplicate of        0001275 posix_memalign missing
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 bernhardf - 03-24-07 12:31  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
So.. why do you file this against buildroot and not properly against
uClibc? 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 Franck78 - 03-24-07 12:48  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I did !
http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=1275

If a correction is not released after 19 months, it will never be, no ? 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
03-24-07 12:15  Franck78       New Issue                                    
03-24-07 12:15  Franck78       Status                   new => assigned     
03-24-07 12:15  Franck78       Assigned To               => buildroot       
03-24-07 12:15  Franck78       File Added: uClibc-0.9.28.3-posix_memalign.patch 
                  
03-24-07 12:17  Franck78       Issue Monitored: Franck78                    
03-24-07 12:31  bernhardf      Note Added: 0002276                          
03-24-07 12:48  Franck78       Note Added: 0002277                          
03-24-07 12:57  bernhardf      Relationship added       duplicate of 0001275
======================================================================

             reply	other threads:[~2007-03-24 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-24 19:57 bugs at busybox.net [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-31 12:37 [Buildroot] [buildroot 0001287]: posix_memalign() declared but not implemented bugs at busybox.net
2007-03-24 19:48 bugs at busybox.net
2007-03-24 19:32 bugs at busybox.net
2007-03-24 19:15 bugs at busybox.net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c252918fb0930b5ef0f0253ac098985f@busybox.net \
    --to=bugs@busybox.net \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox