Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/5] package/nvidia-modprobe: new package
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 23:49:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9cde36d-d4bd-0752-de06-1cc9a75b0cac@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+h8R2rq67w5b0qhgcMZewNehLKx-CRBDxOX1faixhv6QP=WPg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Christian,

Le 21/11/2020 ? 21:32, Christian Stewart a ?crit?:
> Hi Romain,
> 
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:19 AM Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>> +NVIDIA_MODPROBE_VERSION = 450.57
>>> +NVIDIA_MODPROBE_SITE = $(call github,NVIDIA,nvidia-modprobe,$(NVIDIA_MODPROBE_VERSION))
>>> +NVIDIA_MODPROBE_LICENSE = GPL-2
>>
>> The license should use identifier like GPL-2.0 or GPL-2.0+.
>> Here it should be GPL-2.0.
> 
> Ok, noted.
> 
>>> +NVIDIA_MODPROBE_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
>>> +
>>> +NVIDIA_MODPROBE_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
>>
>> Why ? the binary is build by using gcc directly without any build system.
> 
> At one point I had errors about pkgconf, so I added the dependency.
> Will try building it without the dependency and see if it works.

I tried without host-pkgconf and nvidia-modprobe build.

> 
>>> +NVIDIA_MODPROBE_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
>>> +
>>> +define NVIDIA_MODPROBE_BUILD_CMDS
>>> +     mkdir -p $(@D)/bin
>>> +     $(TARGET_MAKE_ENV) $(TARGET_CC) $(TARGET_CFLAGS) $(TARGET_LDFLAGS) \
>>> +             -I $(@D)/common-utils -I $(@D)/modprobe-utils \
>>> +             -o $(@D)/bin/nvidia-modprobe \
>>> +             -DNV_LINUX=true -DPROGRAM_NAME=\"nvidia-modprobe\" \
>>> +             -DNVIDIA_VERSION=\"$(NVIDIA_MODPROBE_VERSION)\" \
>>> +             $(@D)/nvidia-modprobe.c $(@D)/modprobe-utils/nvidia-modprobe-utils.c \
>>> +             $(@D)/modprobe-utils/pci-sysfs.c $(@D)/common-utils/common-utils.c \
>>> +             $(@D)/common-utils/msg.c $(@D)/common-utils/nvgetopt.c
>>> +endef
>>
>> There is a Makefile why not using it ?
>> Ok it want to install the man pages but it should be easy to fix it.
> 
> The makefile was not working correctly and doing a lot of extra stuff
> we don't need.
> 
> Why is storing the simplified build commands in the makefile via a
> patch more clear / easy to maintain than directly in the Buildroot
> makefiles?
> 
> If necessary, I will re-format this into the makefile via a patch for
> the next revision. But this definitely works fine as-is and we are
> unlikely to need a more complicated build script for this package in
> the future.

It was not clear why you don't use the Makefile provided by Nvidia.
Indeed the build is ok as is but we should use the Makefile provided by the
package if possible. I'm ok to keep as is if the Makefile provided by Nvidia
doesn't work with Buildroot.

Note: there are some examples of packages installing a Makefile instead of
calling gcc from package.mk:

$ find package/ -name Makefile
package/ramsmp/Makefile
package/dhrystone/Makefile
package/ramspeed/Makefile

For simple program like fan-ctrl there is no Makefile:
package/fan-ctrl/fan-ctrl.mk

> 
>>> +define NVIDIA_MODPROBE_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS
>>> +     $(INSTALL) -D -m 644 $(@D)/modprobe-utils/nvidia-modprobe-utils.h \
>>> +             $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/nvidia-modprobe-utils/nvidia-modprobe-utils.h
>>> +     $(INSTALL) -D -m 644 $(@D)/modprobe-utils/pci-enum.h \
>>> +             $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/nvidia-modprobe-utils/pci-enum.h
>>> +     $(INSTALL) -D -m 644 $(@D)/common-utils/common-utils.h \
>>> +             $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/nvidia-modprobe-utils/nvidia-common-utils.h
>>> +     $(INSTALL) -D -m 644 $(@D)/common-utils/msg.h \
>>> +             $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/nvidia-modprobe-utils/msg.h
>>> +     $(INSTALL) -D -m 644 $(@D)/common-utils/nvgetopt.h \
>>> +             $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/nvidia-modprobe-utils/nvgetopt.h
>>> +endef
>>
>> Same, we really don't want to maintain the gcc command line and the list of
>> installed files. The Makefile must do it for us :)
> 
> Why? The list won't change. How is storing it in a patch file easier
> to maintain than in this makefile?

How do you know that this list won't change when the package will be updated to
a newer version ?

Usually we prefer using:
make -C $(@D) DEST_DIR=$(STAGING_DIR) install

> 
>>> +
>>> +define NVIDIA_MODPROBE_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS
>>> +     $(INSTALL) -m 0755 $(@D)/bin/nvidia-modprobe \
>>> +             $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/nvidia-modprobe
>>> +endef
>>
>> Same.
> 
> ??

Usually we prefer using:
make -C $(@D) DEST_DIR=$(TARGET_DIR) install

The headers installed are removed by Buildroot during target-finalize.

Best regards,
Romain


> 
> Best,
> Christian
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-21 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19  7:53 [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/5] package/nvidia-modprobe: new package Christian Stewart
2020-11-19  7:53 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/5] package/linux4tegra: " Christian Stewart
2020-11-21 10:40   ` Romain Naour
2020-11-21 20:45     ` Christian Stewart
2020-11-21 23:10       ` Romain Naour
2021-01-11 23:28       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2021-01-11 23:45   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2020-11-19  7:53 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 3/5] package/libnvidia-container: " Christian Stewart
2020-11-21 10:55   ` Romain Naour
2020-11-21 20:54     ` Christian Stewart
2020-11-21 23:25       ` Romain Naour
2020-11-25  2:06     ` Christian Stewart
2020-11-19  7:53 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 4/5] board: add nvidia jetson tx2 support Christian Stewart
2020-11-19 13:40   ` Romain Naour
2020-11-21 10:06     ` Romain Naour
2020-11-21 21:12       ` Christian Stewart
2020-11-21 22:12         ` Peter Seiderer
2020-11-21 23:47         ` Romain Naour
2020-11-23 23:07     ` Christian Stewart
2020-11-24 14:46       ` Romain Naour
2020-11-24 16:30         ` Graham Leva
2020-11-25  1:53           ` Christian Stewart
2020-11-26 16:45             ` Graham Leva
2020-11-19  7:53 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 5/5] board: add nvidia jetson nano support Christian Stewart
2020-11-21 11:03   ` Romain Naour
2020-11-21 21:01     ` Christian Stewart
2020-11-21 23:31       ` Romain Naour
2020-11-21 10:18 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/5] package/nvidia-modprobe: new package Romain Naour
2020-11-21 20:32   ` Christian Stewart
2020-11-21 22:49     ` Romain Naour [this message]
2021-01-11 23:11       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2021-01-11 23:20 ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9cde36d-d4bd-0752-de06-1cc9a75b0cac@gmail.com \
    --to=romain.naour@gmail.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox