From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:44:35 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Buildroot] I need a patch for AT91 to use a 2009.11 buildroot
 version? like buildroot-v23434.patch in 23434 version
References: <3ce6ccff1001130706i2cd1e5cahf159864c92d101e0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <hikt9j$tir$1@ger.gmane.org>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 2010-01-13, Miguel Angel Brintrup <brintrup@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm install a BuildRoot development environment based in 23434
> version and respective patch. It's described in this page:
>
> http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRootBuild#Get_buildroot
>
> I could generate my own file systems with BuildRoot and my own
> kernel with codesourcery tools.
>
> This environment works, but the newest versions of BuildRoot
> have most great tools to my develop.
>
> I need a patch for AT91 (AT91SAM9261) to use a 2009.11
> buildroot version? like buildroot-v23434.patch I use for
> BuilRoot 23434 version.
>
> Any of you have a patch to newest versions of BuildRoot for
> AT91??

What needs patching?  I use buildroot (from a git snapshot a
couple weeks ago) on an AT91 eval board, and it seems to work
fine without any patches.

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow! My polyvinyl cowboy
                                  at               wallet was made in Hong
                               visi.com            Kong by Montgomery Clift!