From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Kuhls Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 19:17:57 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH/next 30/31] package/vsxu: new package References: <1456006176-21308-1-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <1456006176-21308-31-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20160305161552.36cc6677@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, Am Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:15:52 +0100 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: >> +VSXU_LICENSE = GPLv3+, LGPLv2.1+ >> +VSXU_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING COPYING.LESSER > > COPYING.LESSER is actually the text of LGPLv3, so are you sure it's > under LGPLv2.1+ ? yes, searching for "version 3 " found only artiste/src/artiste_main.cpp, the rest of the LGPL-licensed files contain * it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the * License, or Quoting https://github.com/vovoid/vsxu/blob/glfw3/COPYING "All code (C and C++) is released under the GNU GPL 3.0 as included in this document unless explicitly released as LGPL 3.0 (check source files)." This is indeed misleading because I found only file referencing GPLv3+, the rest contains * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or so I changed to VSXU_LICENSE to VSXU_LICENSE = GPLv3+ (artiste/src/artiste_main.cpp), GPLv2+, LGPLv2+ and hope its ok. > Also, it would be good if you could specify which parts of the software > are under GPLv3, which parts are under LGPLv3. Of course, it's this is > reasonably possible. This will be difficult ;) $ grep -r "(LGPL)" * | wc -l 267 $ grep -r "(GPL)" * | wc -l 209 Regards, Bernd