From: MikeW <mw_phil@yahoo.co.uk>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] 'ld' gives "unrecognised emulation mode" - ARM toolchain unbuildable ??
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:34:37 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20061122T095656-727@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: f2b55d220611211208yef912b8p4c00bfd2ee2a2eca@mail.gmail.com
Michael K. Edwards <medwards.linux@...> writes:
>
> You probably want to stick to armelf(b)-linux-eabi, since that's
> clearly the right thing in later toolchains. EABI on ARM seems to be
> better supported in an up-to-date toolchain combination consisting of
> gcc 4.1.1, binutils 2.17.50.0.6, and headers from glibc 2.5 and kernel
> 2.6.16 or later. I used crosstool to build a glibc toolchain first,
> and am currently grinding through compiling a full glibc/NPTL
> userspace with ptxdist, cleaning up all the non-uClibc-specific
> issues. Once I have the kinks worked out of that, I'll be trying a
> uClibc version; I'll keep the list posted.
>
> As of gcc 4.1.1, it seems that one still needs this patch to fix up
> some include issues:
>
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.42/contrib/2006/crosstool-0.38-add-gcc-4.1-20060210.diff
>
> Also, if your target is big-endian, you need the one-line patch below
> so that big-endian is really big-endian.
>
> Cheers,
> - Michael
Many thanks - but I am unable to configure Buildroot to give an EABI
compatible (version != 0) toolchain.
I have now tried also using the most recent GCC and Binutils in the
Buildroot menuconfig options, this using buildroot-20061031.
What is the required 'GNU target suffix' or other setting to enable
EABI operation ? (Obviously I have set 'Target ABI: EABI')
The only target suffix that appears to give a workable toolchain
(i.e. one that doesn't say 'unrecognised emulation mode')
is 'elf-linux', and that doesn't seem to support EABI (objects built
with it have EABI version 0)
If I use any other target suffix settings in the menuconfig
(e.g. elf-linux-eabi or even tried elf-linux_eabi) I get:
".../bin/ld: unrecognised emulation mode: armelf_linux
Supported emulations: armelf_linux_eabi" ... but I am unable to
obtain that setting :(
Regards,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-22 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-01 14:14 [Buildroot] 'ld' gives "unrecognised emulation mode" during make; gcc-3.4.3 MikeW
2006-11-02 12:09 ` [Buildroot] 'ld' gives "unrecognised emulation mode" - ARM toolchain unbuildable ?? MikeW
2006-11-02 18:01 ` [Buildroot] 'ld' gives MikeW
2006-11-21 19:19 ` [Buildroot] 'ld' gives "unrecognised emulation mode" - ARM toolchain unbuildable ?? MikeW
2006-11-21 20:08 ` Michael K. Edwards
2006-11-22 9:34 ` MikeW [this message]
2006-11-22 17:08 ` Michael K. Edwards
2006-11-29 14:58 ` MikeW
2006-11-29 15:06 ` [Buildroot] 'ld' gives MikeW
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20061122T095656-727@post.gmane.org \
--to=mw_phil@yahoo.co.uk \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox