From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2738474 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:18:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669411135; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=obw1pENv2vgEAR/eFxDqx84W2wJlp9TM42GBqD0gvAY=; b=Ve2cM/LZd/+LVl6VQVQod94t2zYHU29OhgKIk8U2wMEw7lPK6o/0uN1OIuMwjAWtHAj2oM ooRFtvl11N+/U7CAyLYESZcbSov9nLSeoTeLJ2HYPBNkwILIGkV7s7QTz+lcV5YnzNlk7c c5n1u5hPvlXMYEsG5Y1A7xLiSbh4eq0= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-460-Mm_L63-6O7C4w8e4QTTm7A-1; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 16:18:53 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Mm_L63-6O7C4w8e4QTTm7A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 882C8811E67 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.24]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 338D02166B46 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:18:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev Subject: Porting procmail to C99 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 22:18:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87fse6ka12.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Is procmail still widely used? It has its own non-autoconf build configuration system, and it's not easily fixed because it assumes that implicit function declarations are supported: sources with multiple functions are compiled (but not linked), and those functions that produce diagnostics are flagged as unsupported (or so I assume). I'm inclined towards building procmail in C89 mode for Fedora. Thanks, Florian