Re: Best method to share that something is broken + patches?

[Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 788 bytes --]


Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> We didn't really have a proper chance to discuss how the list mechanics
> should work yet,
> as we got caught a bit off guard by the LWN (and then Phoronix)
> articles.
>
> [...]
>
> I'm thinking maybe a shared git repository for the patches (and/or just
> links to bug
> reports), while we keep the list for discussion of non-trivial issues,
> or significant
> PSAs (including a major package being broken, especially if it doesn't
> get frequent
> releases) rather than polluting the ML with some random package which
> only a single
> distro happens to maintain.

We may also need some weak guidelines on package name normalisation
and suggestions welcome for the structure of any repo if we pursue
that option.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 377 bytes --]