From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from alt2.a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk (a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk [81.187.30.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A30F1877 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cartman.offog.org ([2001:8b0:83b:b53f::a]) by painless-a.thn.aa.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ouV0d-00AAmZ-K8; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:40:02 +0000 Received: from ats by cartman.offog.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ouUze-00051M-1a; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:39:02 +0000 From: Adam Sampson To: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha Cc: Sam James , Florian Weimer , autoconf@gnu.org, c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev, Zack Weinberg , David Seifert , Gentoo Toolchain , Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= , Paul Eggert , Frederic Berat Subject: Re: On time64 and Large File Support References: <87wn81q254.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:39:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87wn81q254.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha's message of "Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:19:35 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha writes: > We should define new target triplets for this if it's really required. If the consensus on this does come down to the definition of new architecture triplets, are there any other changes that should (or could) be made at the same time, beyond time64 and LFS? Thanks, -- Adam Sampson