From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Benjamin Subject: Re: Has rgw recently switched to deque usuage?? Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 06:00:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1358966418.44210231.1456052441419.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <56C87B29.5040005@digiware.nl> <1565267399.44124691.1456003985235.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <56C8E590.7090609@digiware.nl> <1135436239.44164632.1456013615024.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <56C9958E.5020008@digiware.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:38094 "EHLO mx4-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750942AbcBURfZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2016 12:35:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56C9958E.5020008@digiware.nl> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Willem Jan Withagen Cc: Ceph Development sure, send github pull request tagged "rgw" when ready Matt ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Willem Jan Withagen" > To: "Matt Benjamin" > Cc: "Ceph Development" > Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 5:46:38 AM > Subject: Re: Has rgw recently switched to deque usuage?? > > On 21-2-2016 01:13, Matt Benjamin wrote: > > Hi Willem, > > > > That's good news, but massive header re-ordering sounds suspicious. > > Likely, there are just missing unix headers. > > Overnight the build completed. > Now running gmake check. > If that gets to my normal level of PASSED of around 110 of 133 than I > commit the rgw changes and you can find that in my pull to comment about > and we take it from there. > > --WjW > > -- -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-707-0660 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309