From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dillaman Subject: Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:27:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1749420664.9284413.1423513637594.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <54D3EEF6.1070701@dachary.org> <1050495133.7647881.1423231520223.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <54D4CD03.8000806@dachary.org> <408976183.7693525.1423233776228.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <54D8882A.6010804@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx5-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.37]:44436 "EHLO mx5-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932799AbbBIU2U convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:28:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54D8882A.6010804@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Josh Durgin , Ceph Development I would agree with your assessment that http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/= 10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-feb= ruary sounds like a repeat of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4959. Josh, thoughts? --=20 Jason Dillaman=20 Red Hat=20 dillaman@redhat.com=20 http://www.redhat.com=20 ----- Original Message ----- =46rom: "Loic Dachary" To: "Jason Dillaman" Cc: "Josh Durgin" , "Ceph Development" Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 5:12:58 AM Subject: Re: RBD tests on the next dumpling release Hi Jason, Your backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 at https://github.= com/ceph/ceph/pull/3655 was added to the dumpling-backports branch and = the RBD suite run came back with one error. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a0= 5886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february I'm under the impression that this is unrelated. What do you think ? The error found in the previous run http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-fd37e5a9749c557= 9a592ebe926a3c576be0617cd-3-february could not be repeated by another run of the same test http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-05_21:41:04-rbd-dumpling-backports= ---basic-multi/ and I closed the ticket as "Can't reproduce" since you did not reproduc= e it locally either. Feel free to change the state of the ticket if, fo= r instance, you would like it to remain open during a few weeks in case= it shows up again. Cheers On 06/02/2015 15:42, Jason Dillaman wrote: > I would say #9854 is critical for this dumpling point release since i= t fixes a regression that would otherwise be introduced by this point r= elease. >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html