From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDoXVkaW8=?= Martins Subject: Re: OSD deadlock with cephfs client and OSD on same machine Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:17:30 +0000 Message-ID: <20121105201730.723eb457.ctpm@ist.utl.pt> References: <201205290944.33983.a.ott@m-privacy.de> <201205300908.56991.a.ott@m-privacy.de> <201206011135.38119.a.ott@m-privacy.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp1.ist.utl.pt ([193.136.128.21]:37641 "EHLO smtp1.ist.utl.pt" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751642Ab2KEURd (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:17:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201206011135.38119.a.ott@m-privacy.de> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Amon Ott Cc: Sage Weil , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:35:37 +0200 Amon Ott wrote: >=20 > After backporting syncfs() support into Debian stable libc6 2.11 and=20 > recompiling Ceph with it, our test cluster is now running with syncfs= (). >=20 Hi, We're running OSDs on top of Debian wheezy, which unfortunately has libc6 2.13. By chance, do you still have that patch to backport syncfs(= )? Thanks in advance Best regards Cl=C3=A1udio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html