From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok() Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 02:35:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20160809093531.GA3937@infradead.org> References: <1470223689-17783-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1470223689-17783-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20160809082756.GA11657@infradead.org> <20160809093246.GB5107@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160809093246.GB5107@quack2.suse.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Kara Cc: "Yan, Zheng" , Miklos Szeredi , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:32:46AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > So do you suggest xfs_iop_change_ok and xfs_iop_setattr_nonsize? I don't > really care, I just remember Dave had some ideas how names should be > consistent and this naming was his idea... Nah, just skip the prefix entirely, and maybe also already adopt to the new setattr_prepare naming. But if Dave already had an opinions let's just keep it as-is and sort the naming out later. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs