From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: idryomov@gmail.com, zyan@redhat.com, sage@redhat.com,
agruenba@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] ceph: return -ERANGE if virtual xattr value didn't fit in buffer
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:27:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624162726.17413-3-jlayton@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624162726.17413-1-jlayton@kernel.org>
The getxattr manpage states that we should return ERANGE if the
destination buffer size is too small to hold the value.
ceph_vxattrcb_layout does this internally, but we should be doing
this for all vxattrs.
Fix the only caller of getxattr_cb to check the returned size
against the buffer length and return -ERANGE if it doesn't fit.
Drop the same check in ceph_vxattrcb_layout and just rely on the
caller to handle it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/ceph/xattr.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
index e90e19e9660b..9b77dca0b786 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static ssize_t ceph_vxattrcb_layout(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val,
const char *ns_field = " pool_namespace=";
char buf[128];
size_t len, total_len = 0;
- int ret;
+ ssize_t ret;
pool_ns = ceph_try_get_string(ci->i_layout.pool_ns);
@@ -87,11 +87,8 @@ static ssize_t ceph_vxattrcb_layout(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val,
if (pool_ns)
total_len += strlen(ns_field) + pool_ns->len;
- if (!size) {
- ret = total_len;
- } else if (total_len > size) {
- ret = -ERANGE;
- } else {
+ ret = total_len;
+ if (size >= total_len) {
memcpy(val, buf, len);
ret = len;
if (pool_name) {
@@ -803,8 +800,11 @@ ssize_t __ceph_getxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void *value,
if (err)
return err;
err = -ENODATA;
- if (!(vxattr->exists_cb && !vxattr->exists_cb(ci)))
+ if (!(vxattr->exists_cb && !vxattr->exists_cb(ci))) {
err = vxattr->getxattr_cb(ci, value, size);
+ if (size && size < err)
+ err = -ERANGE;
+ }
return err;
}
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-24 16:27 [PATCH v4 0/3] ceph: don't NULL terminate virtual xattrs Jeff Layton
2019-06-24 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ceph: make getxattr_cb return ssize_t Jeff Layton
2019-06-24 16:27 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2019-06-24 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ceph: don't NULL terminate virtual xattrs Jeff Layton
2019-06-25 13:29 ` Yan, Zheng
2019-06-25 14:35 ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-06-25 14:49 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190624162726.17413-3-jlayton@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sage@redhat.com \
--cc=zyan@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox