CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 28/31] rbd: make get_lock_owner_info() return a single locker or NULL
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:06:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230813160605.1080385-28-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230813160605.1080385-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit f38cb9d9c2045dad16eead4a2e1aedfddd94603b ]

Make the "num_lockers can be only 0 or 1" assumption explicit and
simplify the API by getting rid of output parameters in preparation
for calling get_lock_owner_info() twice before blocklisting.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/block/rbd.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index a4188825bd195..189e2f74b9147 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -3851,10 +3851,17 @@ static void wake_lock_waiters(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, int result)
 	list_splice_tail_init(&rbd_dev->acquiring_list, &rbd_dev->running_list);
 }
 
-static int get_lock_owner_info(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
-			       struct ceph_locker **lockers, u32 *num_lockers)
+static void free_locker(struct ceph_locker *locker)
+{
+	if (locker)
+		ceph_free_lockers(locker, 1);
+}
+
+static struct ceph_locker *get_lock_owner_info(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
 {
 	struct ceph_osd_client *osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
+	struct ceph_locker *lockers;
+	u32 num_lockers;
 	u8 lock_type;
 	char *lock_tag;
 	int ret;
@@ -3863,39 +3870,45 @@ static int get_lock_owner_info(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
 
 	ret = ceph_cls_lock_info(osdc, &rbd_dev->header_oid,
 				 &rbd_dev->header_oloc, RBD_LOCK_NAME,
-				 &lock_type, &lock_tag, lockers, num_lockers);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+				 &lock_type, &lock_tag, &lockers, &num_lockers);
+	if (ret) {
+		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "failed to retrieve lockers: %d", ret);
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+	}
 
-	if (*num_lockers == 0) {
+	if (num_lockers == 0) {
 		dout("%s rbd_dev %p no lockers detected\n", __func__, rbd_dev);
+		lockers = NULL;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (strcmp(lock_tag, RBD_LOCK_TAG)) {
 		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "locked by external mechanism, tag %s",
 			 lock_tag);
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		goto out;
+		goto err_busy;
 	}
 
 	if (lock_type == CEPH_CLS_LOCK_SHARED) {
 		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "shared lock type detected");
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		goto out;
+		goto err_busy;
 	}
 
-	if (strncmp((*lockers)[0].id.cookie, RBD_LOCK_COOKIE_PREFIX,
+	WARN_ON(num_lockers != 1);
+	if (strncmp(lockers[0].id.cookie, RBD_LOCK_COOKIE_PREFIX,
 		    strlen(RBD_LOCK_COOKIE_PREFIX))) {
 		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "locked by external mechanism, cookie %s",
-			 (*lockers)[0].id.cookie);
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		goto out;
+			 lockers[0].id.cookie);
+		goto err_busy;
 	}
 
 out:
 	kfree(lock_tag);
-	return ret;
+	return lockers;
+
+err_busy:
+	kfree(lock_tag);
+	ceph_free_lockers(lockers, num_lockers);
+	return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 }
 
 static int find_watcher(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
@@ -3949,51 +3962,56 @@ static int find_watcher(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
 static int rbd_try_lock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
 {
 	struct ceph_client *client = rbd_dev->rbd_client->client;
-	struct ceph_locker *lockers;
-	u32 num_lockers;
+	struct ceph_locker *locker;
 	int ret;
 
 	for (;;) {
+		locker = NULL;
+
 		ret = rbd_lock(rbd_dev);
 		if (ret != -EBUSY)
-			return ret;
+			goto out;
 
 		/* determine if the current lock holder is still alive */
-		ret = get_lock_owner_info(rbd_dev, &lockers, &num_lockers);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-
-		if (num_lockers == 0)
+		locker = get_lock_owner_info(rbd_dev);
+		if (IS_ERR(locker)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(locker);
+			locker = NULL;
+			goto out;
+		}
+		if (!locker)
 			goto again;
 
-		ret = find_watcher(rbd_dev, lockers);
+		ret = find_watcher(rbd_dev, locker);
 		if (ret)
 			goto out; /* request lock or error */
 
 		rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "breaking header lock owned by %s%llu",
-			 ENTITY_NAME(lockers[0].id.name));
+			 ENTITY_NAME(locker->id.name));
 
 		ret = ceph_monc_blocklist_add(&client->monc,
-					      &lockers[0].info.addr);
+					      &locker->info.addr);
 		if (ret) {
-			rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "blocklist of %s%llu failed: %d",
-				 ENTITY_NAME(lockers[0].id.name), ret);
+			rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "failed to blocklist %s%llu: %d",
+				 ENTITY_NAME(locker->id.name), ret);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
 		ret = ceph_cls_break_lock(&client->osdc, &rbd_dev->header_oid,
 					  &rbd_dev->header_oloc, RBD_LOCK_NAME,
-					  lockers[0].id.cookie,
-					  &lockers[0].id.name);
-		if (ret && ret != -ENOENT)
+					  locker->id.cookie, &locker->id.name);
+		if (ret && ret != -ENOENT) {
+			rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "failed to break header lock: %d",
+				 ret);
 			goto out;
+		}
 
 again:
-		ceph_free_lockers(lockers, num_lockers);
+		free_locker(locker);
 	}
 
 out:
-	ceph_free_lockers(lockers, num_lockers);
+	free_locker(locker);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.40.1


       reply	other threads:[~2023-08-13 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230813160605.1080385-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-13 16:06 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2023-08-14 13:17   ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 28/31] rbd: make get_lock_owner_info() return a single locker or NULL Ilya Dryomov
2023-08-13 16:06 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 29/31] rbd: harden get_lock_owner_info() a bit Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230813160605.1080385-28-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox