[PATCH] ceph/decode: Remove unnecessary ‘0’ values from ret

[PATCH] ceph/decode: Remove unnecessary ‘0’ values from ret

[Li kunyu]

ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the
assignment.
Bad is not used and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>
---
 net/ceph/decode.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ceph/decode.c b/net/ceph/decode.c
index bc109a1a4616..9f5f095d8235 100644
--- a/net/ceph/decode.c
+++ b/net/ceph/decode.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int
 ceph_decode_entity_addr_legacy(void **p, void *end,
 			       struct ceph_entity_addr *addr)
 {
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	/* Skip rest of type field */
 	ceph_decode_skip_n(p, end, 3, bad);
@@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ ceph_decode_entity_addr_legacy(void **p, void *end,
 			      sizeof(addr->in_addr), bad);
 	addr->in_addr.ss_family =
 			be16_to_cpu((__force __be16)addr->in_addr.ss_family);
-	ret = 0;
-bad:
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.2

Re: [PATCH] ceph/decode: Remove unnecessary ‘0’ values from ret

[Xiubo Li]

On 9/3/23 04:11, Li kunyu wrote:
> ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the
> assignment.
> Bad is not used and can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>
> ---
>   net/ceph/decode.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/decode.c b/net/ceph/decode.c
> index bc109a1a4616..9f5f095d8235 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/decode.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/decode.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int
>   ceph_decode_entity_addr_legacy(void **p, void *end,
>   			       struct ceph_entity_addr *addr)
>   {
> -	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +	int ret = 0;
>   
>   	/* Skip rest of type field */
>   	ceph_decode_skip_n(p, end, 3, bad);

Hi Kunyu,

The 'bad' lable is used here in this macro.

Thanks

- Xiubo

> @@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ ceph_decode_entity_addr_legacy(void **p, void *end,
>   			      sizeof(addr->in_addr), bad);
>   	addr->in_addr.ss_family =
>   			be16_to_cpu((__force __be16)addr->in_addr.ss_family);
> -	ret = 0;
> -bad:
> +
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   

Re: [PATCH] ceph/decode: Remove unnecessary ‘0’ values from ret

[Simon Horman]

On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 04:11:12AM +0800, Li kunyu wrote:
> ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the
> assignment.
> Bad is not used and can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>

Hi Li Kunyu,

A few things:

* Your clock seems to be in the future.

* I see you have posted similar similar changes to related code.
  Please consider combining them into a single patch,
  or a patch-set.

* Please set the target tree, net-next

  Subject: [PATCH net-next] ...

* net-next is currently closed

## Form letter - net-next-closed

The merge window for v6.6 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after Sept 11th.

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
--
pw-bot: defer

Re: [PATCH] ceph/decode: Remove unnecessary ‘0’ values from ret

[Christophe JAILLET]

Le 01/09/2023 à 05:40, Li kunyu a écrit :
> ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the
> assignment.
> Bad is not used and can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>
> ---
>   net/ceph/decode.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ceph/decode.c b/net/ceph/decode.c
> index bc109a1a4616..9f5f095d8235 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/decode.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/decode.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int
>   ceph_decode_entity_addr_legacy(void **p, void *end,
>   			       struct ceph_entity_addr *addr)
>   {
> -	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +	int ret = 0;
>   
>   	/* Skip rest of type field */
>   	ceph_decode_skip_n(p, end, 3, bad);
> @@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ ceph_decode_entity_addr_legacy(void **p, void *end,
>   			      sizeof(addr->in_addr), bad);
>   	addr->in_addr.ss_family =
>   			be16_to_cpu((__force __be16)addr->in_addr.ss_family);
> -	ret = 0;
> -bad:
> +
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   

This patch is wrong.
Look how the ceph_decode_skip_n() macro, for example, is expended.
You'll see that 'bad' is needed.

I think that your patch was not compile tested.

Please do not send patch that are not at least compile tested. Even when 
it looks obvious.

CJ