ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ceph-client:tls_logger 13/13] net/ceph/messenger_v2.c:2791:12: warning: stack frame size (9848) exceeds limit (8192) in 'process_control'
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 02:29:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202502140205.1AGkREJM-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client.git tls_logger
head:   cd1e899feeb6a7da55cbb74b9245c8bbb77f82ba
commit: cd1e899feeb6a7da55cbb74b9245c8bbb77f82ba [13/13] cephsun: using a dynamic buffer allocation
config: x86_64-randconfig-005-20250213 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250214/202502140205.1AGkREJM-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250214/202502140205.1AGkREJM-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502140205.1AGkREJM-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> net/ceph/messenger_v2.c:2791:12: warning: stack frame size (9848) exceeds limit (8192) in 'process_control' [-Wframe-larger-than]
    2791 | static int process_control(struct ceph_connection *con, void *p, void *end)
         |            ^
   1 warning generated.
--
>> net/ceph/messenger_v1.c:1326:5: warning: stack frame size (13688) exceeds limit (8192) in 'ceph_con_v1_try_read' [-Wframe-larger-than]
    1326 | int ceph_con_v1_try_read(struct ceph_connection *con)
         |     ^
   1 warning generated.


vim +/process_control +2791 net/ceph/messenger_v2.c

cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2790  
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19 @2791  static int process_control(struct ceph_connection *con, void *p, void *end)
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2792  {
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2793  	int tag = con->v2.in_desc.fd_tag;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2794  	int ret;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2795  
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2796  	dout("%s con %p tag %d len %d\n", __func__, con, tag, (int)(end - p));
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2797  
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2798  	switch (tag) {
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2799  	case FRAME_TAG_HELLO:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2800  		ret = process_hello(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2801  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2802  	case FRAME_TAG_AUTH_BAD_METHOD:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2803  		ret = process_auth_bad_method(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2804  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2805  	case FRAME_TAG_AUTH_REPLY_MORE:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2806  		ret = process_auth_reply_more(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2807  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2808  	case FRAME_TAG_AUTH_DONE:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2809  		ret = process_auth_done(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2810  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2811  	case FRAME_TAG_AUTH_SIGNATURE:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2812  		ret = process_auth_signature(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2813  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2814  	case FRAME_TAG_SERVER_IDENT:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2815  		ret = process_server_ident(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2816  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2817  	case FRAME_TAG_IDENT_MISSING_FEATURES:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2818  		ret = process_ident_missing_features(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2819  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2820  	case FRAME_TAG_SESSION_RECONNECT_OK:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2821  		ret = process_session_reconnect_ok(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2822  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2823  	case FRAME_TAG_SESSION_RETRY:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2824  		ret = process_session_retry(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2825  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2826  	case FRAME_TAG_SESSION_RETRY_GLOBAL:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2827  		ret = process_session_retry_global(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2828  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2829  	case FRAME_TAG_SESSION_RESET:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2830  		ret = process_session_reset(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2831  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2832  	case FRAME_TAG_KEEPALIVE2_ACK:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2833  		ret = process_keepalive2_ack(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2834  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2835  	case FRAME_TAG_ACK:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2836  		ret = process_ack(con, p, end);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2837  		break;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2838  	default:
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2839  		pr_err("bad tag %d\n", tag);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2840  		con->error_msg = "protocol error, bad tag";
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2841  		return -EINVAL;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2842  	}
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2843  	if (ret) {
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2844  		dout("%s con %p error %d\n", __func__, con, ret);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2845  		return ret;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2846  	}
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2847  
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2848  	prepare_read_preamble(con);
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2849  	return 0;
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2850  }
cd1a677cad99402 Ilya Dryomov 2020-11-19  2851  

:::::: The code at line 2791 was first introduced by commit
:::::: cd1a677cad994021b19665ed476aea63f5d54f31 libceph, ceph: implement msgr2.1 protocol (crc and secure modes)

:::::: TO: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
:::::: CC: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

                 reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202502140205.1AGkREJM-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=amarkuze@redhat.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).