From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694462EF9D8 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750869823; cv=none; b=qdZJNj8UJBZnRw2eXawOaIkBnJ/m0+YxhyOETjNU9vgoGDtKmwqHPi2NOD/cvlatqvnydPJ8eNqdgUslE/jIICx0RulfL91z08NA8TEV6+d+TOtdtspBDHgCvWuO1B3SVZWZ2udSM3/Rlju3VsPSqKt31mVXbSaOcoclnL74O+I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750869823; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JVhZg1PMZk5m5hcAGMSKkIGHxadGEXg7VEEy+Jz7GCU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=XK3aaEQqD3oB7ABr7ulola1GLQd1w4c6Uu0sLVYsqFSmF4oRajhGpBxoolpE0pJbw+uWQVE0xw5kXW86EPlSKKf2YOMSWQkM7+sN7gzQnpu1QZtnxlgumgdfRHLzeNnhDUGsppjDvRBjT4zZco2brzJSEmKz9cgeoVQ/Jteoo48= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=LGvTb9os; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="LGvTb9os" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1750869820; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XyPG80PW4IJ/xS4M21DeICw+sKXCpLWOr1kJSqwjliw=; b=LGvTb9osjuwpRObMqfbkpnAH8y5nlD5D4EtXMYS2YMvlUQpge7feMjAp4s7mQAhU1ExSnf q/m7LwHRad9iW+gJGKHCodo4KCiRvDKBzbNE7QUmTT5vY1aHrywBmw8B6z4gHn2px97jbC /CYP3mGsCoD83kKBGzFW7sgfbmUJasg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-17-3vK0jWK7P6yEyM03HIOmvA-1; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:43:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3vK0jWK7P6yEyM03HIOmvA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 3vK0jWK7P6yEyM03HIOmvA_1750869813 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADFEC180034E; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.com (unknown [10.42.28.81]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F44319560A3; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:43:30 +0000 (UTC) From: David Howells To: Christian Brauner , Steve French Cc: David Howells , Paulo Alcantara , netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paulo Alcantara Subject: [PATCH v2 14/16] smb: client: fix potential deadlock when reconnecting channels Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:42:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20250625164213.1408754-15-dhowells@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250625164213.1408754-1-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20250625164213.1408754-1-dhowells@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 From: Paulo Alcantara Fix cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect() to take the correct lock order and prevent the following deadlock from happening ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.16.0-rc3-build2+ #1301 Tainted: G S W ------------------------------------------------------ cifsd/6055 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810ad56038 (&tcp_ses->srv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200 but task is already holding lock: ffff888119c64330 (&ret_buf->chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&ret_buf->chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_setup_session+0x81/0x4b0 cifs_get_smb_ses+0x771/0x900 cifs_mount_get_session+0x7e/0x170 cifs_mount+0x92/0x2d0 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x161/0x460 smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180 do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0 path_mount+0x6ee/0x740 do_mount+0x98/0xe0 __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #1 (&ret_buf->ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_match_super+0x101/0x320 sget+0xab/0x270 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x1e0/0x460 smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180 do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0 path_mount+0x6ee/0x740 do_mount+0x98/0xe0 __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&tcp_ses->srv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_noncircular+0x95/0xc0 check_prev_add+0x115/0x2f0 validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200 __cifs_reconnect+0x8f/0x500 cifs_handle_standard+0x112/0x280 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x64d/0xbc0 kthread+0x2f7/0x310 ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &tcp_ses->srv_lock --> &ret_buf->ses_lock --> &ret_buf->chan_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ret_buf->chan_lock); lock(&ret_buf->ses_lock); lock(&ret_buf->chan_lock); lock(&tcp_ses->srv_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cifsd/6055: #0: ffffffff857de398 (&cifs_tcp_ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x7b/0x200 #1: ffff888119c64060 (&ret_buf->ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x9c/0x200 #2: ffff888119c64330 (&ret_buf->chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200 Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: David Howells Fixes: d7d7a66aacd6 ("cifs: avoid use of global locks for high contention data") Reviewed-by: David Howells Tested-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) Signed-off-by: David Howells --- fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h | 1 + fs/smb/client/connect.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h b/fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h index da963294a573..fdd95e5100cd 100644 --- a/fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h +++ b/fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h @@ -709,6 +709,7 @@ inc_rfc1001_len(void *buf, int count) struct TCP_Server_Info { struct list_head tcp_ses_list; struct list_head smb_ses_list; + struct list_head rlist; /* reconnect list */ spinlock_t srv_lock; /* protect anything here that is not protected */ __u64 conn_id; /* connection identifier (useful for debugging) */ int srv_count; /* reference counter */ diff --git a/fs/smb/client/connect.c b/fs/smb/client/connect.c index c48869c29e15..864de24e23d5 100644 --- a/fs/smb/client/connect.c +++ b/fs/smb/client/connect.c @@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ static void smb2_query_server_interfaces(struct work_struct *work) (SMB_INTERFACE_POLL_INTERVAL * HZ)); } +#define set_need_reco(server) \ +do { \ + guard(spinlock)(&server->srv_lock); \ + if (server->tcpStatus != CifsExiting) \ + server->tcpStatus = CifsNeedReconnect; \ +} while (0) + /* * Update the tcpStatus for the server. * This is used to signal the cifsd thread to call cifs_reconnect @@ -137,39 +144,41 @@ void cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, bool all_channels) { - struct TCP_Server_Info *pserver; + struct TCP_Server_Info *nserver; struct cifs_ses *ses; + LIST_HEAD(reco); int i; - /* If server is a channel, select the primary channel */ - pserver = SERVER_IS_CHAN(server) ? server->primary_server : server; - /* if we need to signal just this channel */ if (!all_channels) { - spin_lock(&server->srv_lock); - if (server->tcpStatus != CifsExiting) - server->tcpStatus = CifsNeedReconnect; - spin_unlock(&server->srv_lock); + set_need_reco(server); return; } - spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock); - list_for_each_entry(ses, &pserver->smb_ses_list, smb_ses_list) { - if (cifs_ses_exiting(ses)) - continue; - spin_lock(&ses->chan_lock); - for (i = 0; i < ses->chan_count; i++) { - if (!ses->chans[i].server) + if (SERVER_IS_CHAN(server)) + server = server->primary_server; + scoped_guard(spinlock, &cifs_tcp_ses_lock) { + set_need_reco(server); + list_for_each_entry(ses, &server->smb_ses_list, smb_ses_list) { + guard(spinlock)(&ses->ses_lock); + if (ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING) continue; - - spin_lock(&ses->chans[i].server->srv_lock); - if (ses->chans[i].server->tcpStatus != CifsExiting) - ses->chans[i].server->tcpStatus = CifsNeedReconnect; - spin_unlock(&ses->chans[i].server->srv_lock); + guard(spinlock)(&ses->chan_lock); + for (i = 1; i < ses->chan_count; i++) { + nserver = ses->chans[i].server; + if (!nserver) + continue; + nserver->srv_count++; + list_add(&nserver->rlist, &reco); + } } - spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock); } - spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock); + + list_for_each_entry_safe(server, nserver, &reco, rlist) { + list_del_init(&server->rlist); + set_need_reco(server); + cifs_put_tcp_session(server, 0); + } } /*