public inbox for ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
To: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Milind Changire <mchangir@redhat.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] ceph: Split out page-array discarding to a function
Date: Wed,  7 Jan 2026 13:01:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260107210139.40554-5-CFSworks@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260107210139.40554-1-CFSworks@gmail.com>

Discarding a page array (i.e. after failure to submit it) is a little
complex:
- Every folio in the batch needs to be redirtied and unlocked.
- Some folios are bounce pages created for fscrypt; the underlying
  plaintext folios also need to be redirtied and unlocked.
- The array itself can come either from the mempool or general kalloc,
  so different free functions need to be used depending on which.

Although currently only ceph_submit_write() does this, this logic is
complex enough to warrant its own function. Move it to a new
ceph_discard_page_array() function that is called by ceph_submit_write()
instead.

Suggested-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ceph/addr.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
index 467aa7242b49..3becb13a09fe 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@ -1222,6 +1222,43 @@ void ceph_allocate_page_array(struct address_space *mapping,
 	ceph_wbc->len = 0;
 }
 
+static inline
+void ceph_discard_page_array(struct writeback_control *wbc,
+			     struct ceph_writeback_ctl *ceph_wbc)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct page *page;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&ceph_wbc->fbatch); i++) {
+		struct folio *folio = ceph_wbc->fbatch.folios[i];
+
+		if (!folio)
+			continue;
+
+		page = &folio->page;
+		redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
+		unlock_page(page);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ceph_wbc->locked_pages; i++) {
+		page = ceph_fscrypt_pagecache_page(ceph_wbc->pages[i]);
+
+		if (!page)
+			continue;
+
+		redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
+		unlock_page(page);
+	}
+
+	if (ceph_wbc->from_pool) {
+		mempool_free(ceph_wbc->pages, ceph_wb_pagevec_pool);
+		ceph_wbc->from_pool = false;
+	} else
+		kfree(ceph_wbc->pages);
+	ceph_wbc->pages = NULL;
+	ceph_wbc->locked_pages = 0;
+}
+
 static inline
 bool is_folio_index_contiguous(const struct ceph_writeback_ctl *ceph_wbc,
 			      const struct folio *folio)
@@ -1445,35 +1482,7 @@ int ceph_submit_write(struct address_space *mapping,
 	BUG_ON(len < ceph_fscrypt_page_offset(page) + thp_size(page) - offset);
 
 	if (!ceph_inc_osd_stopping_blocker(fsc->mdsc)) {
-		for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&ceph_wbc->fbatch); i++) {
-			struct folio *folio = ceph_wbc->fbatch.folios[i];
-
-			if (!folio)
-				continue;
-
-			page = &folio->page;
-			redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
-			unlock_page(page);
-		}
-
-		for (i = 0; i < ceph_wbc->locked_pages; i++) {
-			page = ceph_fscrypt_pagecache_page(ceph_wbc->pages[i]);
-
-			if (!page)
-				continue;
-
-			redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
-			unlock_page(page);
-		}
-
-		if (ceph_wbc->from_pool) {
-			mempool_free(ceph_wbc->pages, ceph_wb_pagevec_pool);
-			ceph_wbc->from_pool = false;
-		} else
-			kfree(ceph_wbc->pages);
-		ceph_wbc->pages = NULL;
-		ceph_wbc->locked_pages = 0;
-
+		ceph_discard_page_array(wbc, ceph_wbc);
 		ceph_osdc_put_request(req);
 		return -EIO;
 	}
-- 
2.51.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-07 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-07 21:01 [PATCH v2 0/6] ceph: CephFS writeback correctness and performance fixes Sam Edwards
2026-01-07 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ceph: Do not propagate page array emplacement errors as batch errors Sam Edwards
2026-01-08 20:05   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-01-07 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ceph: Remove error return from ceph_process_folio_batch() Sam Edwards
2026-01-08 20:08   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-01-09  0:29     ` Sam Edwards
2026-01-07 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ceph: Free page array when ceph_submit_write fails Sam Edwards
2026-01-07 21:01 ` Sam Edwards [this message]
2026-01-08 20:11   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ceph: Split out page-array discarding to a function Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-01-07 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ceph: Assert writeback loop invariants Sam Edwards
2026-01-08 20:12   ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-01-07 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ceph: Fix write storm on fscrypted files Sam Edwards

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260107210139.40554-5-CFSworks@gmail.com \
    --to=cfsworks@gmail.com \
    --cc=Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchangir@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox