CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-cachefs@redhat.com" <linux-cachefs@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: fscache recursive hang -- similar to loopback NFS issues
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:32:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20765.1407249166@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANP1eJGoT2RmKB6asjbFgP=emLuxQqgqE4Xf9Gx7fYzPfS1img@mail.gmail.com>

Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com> wrote:

> FSCache already tracks statistics about how long writes and reads take
> (at least if you enable that option). With those stats in hand we
> should be able generate a default timeout value that works well and
> avoid a tunable.

If stat generation is going to be on all the time, it should probably use
something other than atomic ops.  NFS uses a set of ints on each CPU which are
added together when needed.

David

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-05 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-19 20:20 fscache recursive hang -- similar to loopback NFS issues Milosz Tanski
2014-07-19 20:31 ` Milosz Tanski
2014-07-21  6:40 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-21 11:42   ` Milosz Tanski
2014-07-29 16:12     ` David Howells
2014-07-29 21:17       ` NeilBrown
2014-07-30  1:48         ` Milosz Tanski
2014-07-30  2:19           ` NeilBrown
2014-07-30 16:06             ` Milosz Tanski
2014-08-05  4:12               ` Milosz Tanski
2014-08-05  4:49                 ` NeilBrown
2014-08-05 14:32                 ` David Howells [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20765.1407249166@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milosz@adfin.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox