CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: slow performance even when using SSDs
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:09:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FABBE23.4030608@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FABAFE9.5060202@profihost.ag>

OK, here some retests. I had the SDDs conected to an old Raid controller
even i did used them as JBODs (oops).

Here are two new Tests (using kernel 3.4-rc6) it would be great if
someone could tell me if they're fine or bad.

New tests with all 3 SSDs connected to the mainboard.

#~ rados -p rbd bench 60 write
Total time run:        60.342419
Total writes made:     2021
Write size:            4194304
Bandwidth (MB/sec):    133.969

Average Latency:       0.477476
Max latency:           0.942029
Min latency:           0.109467

#~ rados -p rbd bench 60 write -b 4096
Total time run:        60.726326
Total writes made:     59026
Write size:            4096
Bandwidth (MB/sec):    3.797

Average Latency:       0.016459
Max latency:           0.874841
Min latency:           0.002392

Another test with only osd on the disk and the journal in memory / tmpfs:
#~ rados -p rbd bench 60 write
Total time run:        60.513240
Total writes made:     2555
Write size:            4194304
Bandwidth (MB/sec):    168.889

Average Latency:       0.378775
Max latency:           4.59233
Min latency:           0.055179

#~ rados -p rbd bench 60 write -b 4096
Total time run:        60.116260
Total writes made:     281903
Write size:            4096
Bandwidth (MB/sec):    18.318

Average Latency:       0.00341067
Max latency:           0.720486
Min latency:           0.000602

Another problem i have is i'm always getting:
"2012-05-10 15:05:22.140027 mon.0 192.168.0.100:6789/0 19 : [WRN]
message from mon.2 was stamped 0.109244s in the future, clocks not
synchronized"

even on all systems ntp is running fine.

Stefan

Am 10.05.2012 14:09, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> Dear List,
> 
> i'm doing a testsetup with ceph v0.46 and wanted to know how fast ceph is.
> 
> my testsetup:
> 3 servers with Intel Xeon X3440, 180GB SSD Intel 520 Series, 4GB RAM, 2x
> 1Gbit/s LAN each
> 
> All 3 are running as mon a-c and osd 0-2. Two of them are also running
> as mds.2 and mds.3 (has 8GB RAM instead of 4GB).
> 
> All machines run ceph v0.46 and vanilla Linux Kernel v3.0.30 and all of
> them use btrfs on the ssd which serves /srv/{osd,mon}.X. All of them use
> eth0+eth1 as bond0 (mode 6).
> 
> This gives me:
> rados -p rbd bench 60 write
> 
> ...
> Total time run:        61.465323
> Total writes made:     776
> Write size:            4194304
> Bandwidth (MB/sec):    50.500
> 
> Average Latency:       1.2654
> Max latency:           2.77124
> Min latency:           0.170936
> 
> Shouldn't it be at least 100MB/s? (1Gbit/s / 8)
> 
> And rados -p rbd bench 60 write -b 4096 gives pretty bad results:
> Total time run:        60.221130
> Total writes made:     6401
> Write size:            4096
> Bandwidth (MB/sec):    0.415
> 
> Average Latency:       0.150525
> Max latency:           1.12647
> Min latency:           0.026599
> 
> All btrfs ssds are also mounted with noatime.
> 
> Thanks for your help!
> 
> Greets Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-10 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-10 12:09 slow performance even when using SSDs Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-05-10 13:09 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [this message]
2012-05-10 18:24   ` Calvin Morrow
2012-05-10 13:23 ` Designing a cluster guide Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-05-17 21:27   ` Gregory Farnum
2012-05-19  8:37     ` Stefan Priebe
2012-05-19 16:15       ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-05-20  7:56         ` Stefan Priebe
2012-05-20  8:13           ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-05-20  8:19           ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-20  8:27             ` Stefan Priebe
2012-05-20  8:31               ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-21  8:22                 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-05-21 15:03                   ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-20  8:56             ` Tim O'Donovan
2012-05-20  9:24               ` Stefan Priebe
2012-05-20  9:46                 ` Tim O'Donovan
2012-05-20  9:49                   ` Stefan Priebe
2012-05-21 14:59               ` Christian Brunner
2012-05-21 15:05                 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-05-21 15:12                   ` Tomasz Paszkowski
     [not found]                     ` <CANT588uxL7jrf1BfowUeer_AnDTfGjzkWVFhS4aNMaMSst_jyA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-21 15:36                       ` Tomasz Paszkowski
2012-05-21 18:15                         ` Damien Churchill
2012-05-21 20:11                     ` Stefan Priebe
2012-05-21 20:13                       ` Tomasz Paszkowski
2012-05-21 20:14                         ` Stefan Priebe
2012-05-21 20:19                           ` Tomasz Paszkowski
2012-05-21 15:07         ` Tomasz Paszkowski
2012-05-21 21:22           ` Sławomir Skowron
2012-05-21 23:52             ` Quenten Grasso
2012-05-22  0:30               ` Gregory Farnum
2012-05-22  0:42                 ` Quenten Grasso
2012-05-22  0:46                   ` Quenten Grasso
2012-05-22  5:51                     ` Sławomir Skowron
2012-05-29  7:25                       ` Quenten Grasso
2012-05-29 16:50                         ` Tommi Virtanen
2012-05-22  9:04                 ` Jerker Nyberg
2012-05-23  5:31                   ` Gregory Farnum
2012-05-23 19:47                     ` Jerker Nyberg
2012-05-23 21:47                       ` Gregory Farnum
2012-05-24  8:33                         ` Jerker Nyberg
2012-05-22  6:30             ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-05-22  6:59               ` Sławomir Skowron
2012-05-21 18:13       ` Gregory Farnum
2012-05-22  6:20         ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-06-29 18:07     ` Gregory Farnum
2012-06-29 18:42       ` Brian Edmonds
2012-06-29 18:50         ` Gregory Farnum
2012-06-29 20:59           ` Brian Edmonds
2012-06-29 21:11             ` Gregory Farnum
2012-06-29 21:18               ` Brian Edmonds
2012-06-29 21:30                 ` Gregory Farnum
2012-06-29 21:33                 ` Sage Weil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FABBE23.4030608@profihost.ag \
    --to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox