From: Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
To: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "rbd rm image" slow with big images ?
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 21:39:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC7C8F0.9040700@widodh.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC7B57C.8000403@profihost.ag>
On 05/31/2012 08:16 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> One note:
> he has written:
> "then just delete it, without having writed nothing in image "
That is true, but RBD doesn't know that.
There is no record of which object got created and which didn't, so the
removal process has to issue a removal for each RBD object that might exist.
That is the nature of RBD. It makes it simple and reliable.
Wido
>
>
> Am 31.05.2012 20:15, schrieb Wido den Hollander:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 05/31/2012 09:12 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I trying to delete some rbd images with rbd rm,
>>> and it seem to be "slow" with big images.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm testing it with just create a new image (1TB):
>>>
>>> # time rbd -p pool1 create --size 1000000 image2
>>>
>>> real 0m0.031s
>>> user 0m0.015s
>>> sys 0m0.010s
>>>
>>>
>>> then just delete it, without having writed nothing in image
>>>
>>>
>>> # time rbd -p pool1 rm image2
>>> Removing image: 100% complete...done.
>>>
>>> real 1m45.558s
>>> user 0m14.683s
>>> sys 0m17.363s
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> same test with 100GB
>>>
>>> # time rbd -p pool1 create --size 100000 image2
>>>
>>> real 0m0.032s
>>> user 0m0.016s
>>> sys 0m0.007s
>>>
>>> # time rbd -p pool1 rm image2
>>> Removing image: 100% complete...done.
>>>
>>> real 0m10.499s
>>> user 0m1.488s
>>> sys 0m1.720s
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm using journal in tmpfs, 3 servers, 15 osds with 1disk 15K (xfs)
>>> network bandwith,diskio,cpu are low.
>>>
>>> Is it the normal behaviour ? Maybe some xfs tuning could help ?
>>
>> It's in the nature of RBD.
>>
>> A RBD image consists of multiple 4MB (default) RADOS objects.
>>
>> Let's say you have a disk of 40GB, that will contain 10.000 4MB RADOS
>> objects, you can find those objects by doing: rados -p rbd ls
>>
>> Now, when you create a new image only the header is writting, but no
>> object is written.
>>
>> When you start writing to a RBD image you will be writing to one of the
>> 4MB objects. When it doesn't exist it will be created.
>>
>> So when you install your VM it will create objects, but not all of them.
>>
>> RBD knows which RADOS objects to access by three parameters:
>>
>> * Image name
>> * Image size
>> * Stripe size (4MB)
>>
>> So when your VM access for byte Y until Z on the disk, RBD knows which
>> object to access by calculating this.
>>
>> Now, when you start removing the image there is no way of knowing which
>> object exists and which doesn't, so RBD will try to remove all objects.
>>
>> In the case of a fresh image this results in 10.000 RADOS remove
>> operations for non-existent objects and that is slow.
>>
>> Wido
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6bb4f478-37c9-460d-8a0d-698e32dcf08d@mailpro>
2012-05-31 7:12 ` "rbd rm image" slow with big images ? Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-05-31 18:15 ` Wido den Hollander
2012-05-31 18:16 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-05-31 19:39 ` Wido den Hollander [this message]
2012-05-31 18:19 ` Sage Weil
2012-06-01 4:38 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-06-01 13:51 ` Guido Winkelmann
2012-06-01 20:33 ` Wido den Hollander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC7C8F0.9040700@widodh.nl \
--to=wido@widodh.nl \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox