From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] rbd: preserve snapc->seq in rbd_header_set_snap()
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:11:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50083FC9.1030300@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50083F65.5030104@inktank.com>
In rbd_header_set_snap(), there is logic to make the snap context's
seq field get set to a particular snapshot id, or 0 if there is no
snapshot for the rbd image.
This seems to be an artifact of how the current snapshot id for an
rbd_dev was recorded before the rbd_dev->snap_id field began to be
used for that purpose.
There's no need to update the value of snapc->seq here any more, so
stop doing it. Tidy up a few local variables in that function
while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 8a46599..ac8a83f 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -588,29 +588,25 @@ static int snap_by_name(struct rbd_image_header
*header, const char *snap_name,
static int rbd_header_set_snap(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, u64 *size)
{
- struct rbd_image_header *header = &rbd_dev->header;
- struct ceph_snap_context *snapc = header->snapc;
- int ret = -ENOENT;
+ int ret;
down_write(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
if (!memcmp(rbd_dev->snap_name, RBD_SNAP_HEAD_NAME,
sizeof (RBD_SNAP_HEAD_NAME))) {
- if (header->total_snaps)
- snapc->seq = header->snap_seq;
- else
- snapc->seq = 0;
rbd_dev->snap_id = CEPH_NOSNAP;
rbd_dev->snap_exists = false;
rbd_dev->read_only = 0;
if (size)
- *size = header->image_size;
+ *size = rbd_dev->header.image_size;
} else {
- ret = snap_by_name(header, rbd_dev->snap_name,
- &snapc->seq, size);
+ u64 snap_id = 0;
+
+ ret = snap_by_name(&rbd_dev->header, rbd_dev->snap_name,
+ &snap_id, size);
if (ret < 0)
goto done;
- rbd_dev->snap_id = snapc->seq;
+ rbd_dev->snap_id = snap_id;
rbd_dev->snap_exists = true;
rbd_dev->read_only = 1;
}
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-19 17:09 [PATCH 0/4] rbd: use snapc->seq the way server does Alex Elder
2012-07-19 17:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] rbd: don't use snapc->seq that way Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:02 ` Josh Durgin
2012-07-19 21:10 ` Alex Elder
2012-07-19 17:11 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2012-07-19 17:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] rbd: set snapc->seq only when refreshing header Alex Elder
2012-07-19 17:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] rbd: kill rbd_image_header->snap_seq Alex Elder
2012-07-19 22:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] rbd: use snapc->seq the way server does Josh Durgin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50083FC9.1030300@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox