From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/12] rbd: cleanup series
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:58:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500874F5.4090205@inktank.com> (raw)
This series includes a bunch of relatively small cleanups.
They're grouped a bit below, but they apply together in
this sequence and the later ones may have dependencies on
those earlier in the series.
Summaries:
[PATCH 01/12] rbd: drop extra header_rwsem init
[PATCH 02/12] rbd: simplify __rbd_remove_all_snaps()
[PATCH 03/12] rbd: clean up a few dout() calls
[PATCH 04/12] ceph: define snap counts as u32 everywhere
These four are very simple and straightforward cleanups.
[PATCH 05/12] rbd: snapc is unused in rbd_req_sync_read()
[PATCH 06/12] rbd: drop rbd_header_from_disk() gfp_flags parameter
[PATCH 07/12] rbd: drop rbd_dev parameter in snap functions
[PATCH 08/12] rbd: drop rbd_req_sync_exec() "ver" parameter
These four each drop an unused argument from a function.
[PATCH 09/12] rbd: have __rbd_add_snap_dev() return a pointer
[PATCH 10/12] rbd: make rbd_create_rw_ops() return a pointer
These two each change a function so it returns a pointer
rather than filling in the address of a provided pointer.
[PATCH 11/12] rbd: always pass ops array to rbd_req_sync_op()
[PATCH 12/12] rbd: fixes in rbd_header_from_disk()
These comprise slightly more involved refactoring of the
code, but as with the rest of the patches in this series,
there should be no functional difference as a result.
-Alex
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-19 20:58 Alex Elder [this message]
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 01/12] rbd: drop extra header_rwsem init Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 02/12] rbd: simplify __rbd_remove_all_snaps() Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 03/12] rbd: clean up a few dout() calls Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 04/12] ceph: define snap counts as u32 everywhere Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 05/12] rbd: snapc is unused in rbd_req_sync_read() Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 06/12] rbd: drop rbd_header_from_disk() gfp_flags parameter Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 07/12] rbd: drop rbd_dev parameter in snap functions Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 08/12] rbd: drop rbd_req_sync_exec() "ver" parameter Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 09/12] rbd: have __rbd_add_snap_dev() return a pointer Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:08 ` [PATCH 10/12] rbd: make rbd_create_rw_ops() " Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:09 ` [PATCH 11/12] rbd: always pass ops array to rbd_req_sync_op() Alex Elder
2012-07-19 21:09 ` [PATCH 12/12] rbd: fixes in rbd_header_from_disk() Alex Elder
2012-07-26 18:22 ` [PATCH 00/12] rbd: cleanup series Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500874F5.4090205@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox