From: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] rbd: make rbd_create_rw_ops() return a pointer
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:46:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5016F29B.7010001@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501195B2.1050503@inktank.com>
On 07/26/2012 12:08 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> Either rbd_create_rw_ops() will succeed, or it will fail because a
> memory allocation failed. Have it just return a valid pointer or
> null rather than stuffing a pointer into a provided address and
> returning an errno.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 70
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index fd91964..4d8b52c 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -789,22 +789,24 @@ err_out:
> /*
> * helpers for osd request op vectors.
> */
> -static int rbd_create_rw_ops(struct ceph_osd_req_op **ops,
> - int num_ops,
> - int opcode,
> - u32 payload_len)
> -{
> - *ops = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ceph_osd_req_op) * (num_ops + 1),
> - GFP_NOIO);
> - if (!*ops)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - (*ops)[0].op = opcode;
> +static struct ceph_osd_req_op *rbd_create_rw_ops(int num_ops,
> + int opcode, u32 payload_len)
> +{
> + struct ceph_osd_req_op *ops;
> +
> + ops = kzalloc(sizeof (*ops) * (num_ops + 1), GFP_NOIO);
> + if (!ops)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + ops[0].op = opcode;
> +
> /*
> * op extent offset and length will be set later on
> * in calc_raw_layout()
> */
> - (*ops)[0].payload_len = payload_len;
> - return 0;
> + ops[0].payload_len = payload_len;
> +
> + return ops;
> }
>
> static void rbd_destroy_ops(struct ceph_osd_req_op *ops)
> @@ -1039,8 +1041,9 @@ static int rbd_req_sync_op(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
>
> if (!orig_ops) {
> payload_len = (flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE ? len : 0);
> - ret = rbd_create_rw_ops(&ops, 1, opcode, payload_len);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + ops = rbd_create_rw_ops(1, opcode, payload_len);
> + if (!ops)
> goto done;
>
> if ((flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE) && buf) {
> @@ -1103,8 +1106,9 @@ static int rbd_do_op(struct request *rq,
>
> payload_len = (flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE ? seg_len : 0);
>
> - ret = rbd_create_rw_ops(&ops, 1, opcode, payload_len);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + ops = rbd_create_rw_ops(1, opcode, payload_len);
> + if (!ops)
> goto done;
>
> /* we've taken care of segment sizes earlier when we
> @@ -1190,9 +1194,9 @@ static int rbd_req_sync_notify_ack(struct
> rbd_device *rbd_dev,
> struct ceph_osd_req_op *ops;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = rbd_create_rw_ops(&ops, 1, CEPH_OSD_OP_NOTIFY_ACK, 0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + ops = rbd_create_rw_ops(1, CEPH_OSD_OP_NOTIFY_ACK, 0);
> + if (!ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ops[0].watch.ver = cpu_to_le64(ver);
> ops[0].watch.cookie = notify_id;
> @@ -1239,10 +1243,11 @@ static int rbd_req_sync_watch(struct rbd_device
> *rbd_dev)
> {
> struct ceph_osd_req_op *ops;
> struct ceph_osd_client *osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
> + int ret;
>
> - int ret = rbd_create_rw_ops(&ops, 1, CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH, 0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + ops = rbd_create_rw_ops(1, CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH, 0);
> + if (!ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ret = ceph_osdc_create_event(osdc, rbd_watch_cb, 0,
> (void *)rbd_dev, &rbd_dev->watch_event);
> @@ -1282,10 +1287,11 @@ fail:
> static int rbd_req_sync_unwatch(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
> {
> struct ceph_osd_req_op *ops;
> + int ret;
>
> - int ret = rbd_create_rw_ops(&ops, 1, CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH, 0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + ops = rbd_create_rw_ops(1, CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH, 0);
> + if (!ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ops[0].watch.ver = 0;
> ops[0].watch.cookie = cpu_to_le64(rbd_dev->watch_event->cookie);
> @@ -1332,9 +1338,9 @@ static int rbd_req_sync_notify(struct rbd_device
> *rbd_dev)
> int payload_len = sizeof(u32) + sizeof(u32);
> int ret;
>
> - ret = rbd_create_rw_ops(&ops, 1, CEPH_OSD_OP_NOTIFY, payload_len);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + ops = rbd_create_rw_ops(1, CEPH_OSD_OP_NOTIFY, payload_len);
> + if (!ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> info.rbd_dev = rbd_dev;
>
> @@ -1385,10 +1391,12 @@ static int rbd_req_sync_exec(struct rbd_device
> *rbd_dev,
> struct ceph_osd_req_op *ops;
> int class_name_len = strlen(class_name);
> int method_name_len = strlen(method_name);
> - int ret = rbd_create_rw_ops(&ops, 1, CEPH_OSD_OP_CALL,
> + int ret;
> +
> + ops = rbd_create_rw_ops(1, CEPH_OSD_OP_CALL,
> class_name_len + method_name_len + len);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + if (!ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ops[0].cls.class_name = class_name;
> ops[0].cls.class_len = (__u8) class_name_len;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-30 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 19:01 [PATCH 0/7] rbd: more miscellaneous refactoring Alex Elder
2012-07-26 19:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] rbd: have __rbd_add_snap_dev() return a pointer Alex Elder
2012-07-30 20:42 ` Josh Durgin
2012-07-26 19:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] rbd: make rbd_create_rw_ops() " Alex Elder
2012-07-30 20:46 ` Josh Durgin [this message]
2012-07-26 19:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] rbd: pass null version pointer in add_snap() Alex Elder
2012-07-30 20:48 ` Josh Durgin
2012-07-26 19:08 ` [PATCH 4/7] rbd: always pass ops array to rbd_req_sync_op() Alex Elder
2012-07-30 20:51 ` Josh Durgin
2012-07-26 19:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] rbd: fixes in rbd_header_from_disk() Alex Elder
2012-07-30 21:23 ` Josh Durgin
2012-07-30 22:45 ` Alex Elder
2012-07-26 19:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] rbd: return obj version in __rbd_refresh_header() Alex Elder
2012-07-30 21:32 ` Josh Durgin
2012-07-26 19:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] rbd: create rbd_refresh_header() Alex Elder
2012-07-30 21:33 ` Josh Durgin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5016F29B.7010001@inktank.com \
--to=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elder@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox