From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbd: kill rbd_init_watch_dev()
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:48:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50170F4A.8030505@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501700B1.8030002@inktank.com>
On 07/30/2012 04:46 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 12:11 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
>> When an rbd image is mapped, a watch request is issued so that the
>> client will get notified in the event the image header object
>> changes. This is done using rbd_init_watch_dev(), which calls
>> rbd_req_sync_watch().
>>
>> rbd_init_watch_dev() is organized as a loop, arranging to re-issue
>> the request after refreshing the header if -ERANGE ever gets
>> returned. But the only way rbd_req_sync_watch() will return -ERANGE
>> is if the CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH operation returns that, which it will
>> not.
>>
>> As a result, the whole looping structure and in fact the whole
>> function becomes excessive. So get rid of rbd_init_watch_dev(),
>> and call rbd_req_sync_watch() directly in the one place it's used.
>
> Instead of getting rid of this loop, we should make it
> send a compound operation consisting of (CEPH_OSD_OP_ASSERT_VER,
> CEPH_OSD_OP_WATCH). Then we will get -ERANGE if our version
> of the header is out of data, so we don't lose header updates
> before the watch is established.
I don't have compound operations going yet, but now I see why it
may have been written this way. So I'll drop this patch, and
will make a note to re-visit this spot later.
-Alex
> Josh
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/block/rbd.c | 18 +-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> index 94d0745..71e3f3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> @@ -2191,22 +2191,6 @@ static void rbd_bus_del_dev(struct rbd_device
>> *rbd_dev)
>> device_unregister(&rbd_dev->dev);
>> }
>>
>> -static int rbd_init_watch_dev(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
>> -{
>> - int ret, rc;
>> -
>> - do {
>> - ret = rbd_req_sync_watch(rbd_dev);
>> - if (ret == -ERANGE) {
>> - rc = rbd_refresh_header(rbd_dev, NULL);
>> - if (rc < 0)
>> - return rc;
>> - }
>> - } while (ret == -ERANGE);
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> static atomic64_t rbd_id_max = ATOMIC64_INIT(0);
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2510,7 +2494,7 @@ static ssize_t rbd_add(struct bus_type *bus,
>> if (rc)
>> goto err_out_bus;
>>
>> - rc = rbd_init_watch_dev(rbd_dev);
>> + rc = rbd_req_sync_watch(rbd_dev);
>> if (rc)
>> goto err_out_bus;
>>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-30 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 19:11 [PATCH] rbd: kill rbd_init_watch_dev() Alex Elder
2012-07-30 21:46 ` Josh Durgin
2012-07-30 22:48 ` Alex Elder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50170F4A.8030505@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox