From: Dan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rbd: zero return code in rbd_dev_image_id()
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:00:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5085A5E8.3020701@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50857FE2.5060705@inktank.com>
OK, assuming the comment is changed to reflect the "we expect a data
length back here" indication, Alex explained this offline and I agree.
On 10/22/2012 10:18 AM, Dan Mick wrote:
> I really feel like we ought to root-cause this before we patch the
> kernel client. Something isn't working the way we expect.
>
> On 10/22/2012 09:44 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
>> There is a call in rbd_dev_image_id() to rbd_req_sync_exec()
>> to get the image id for an image. Despite the "get_id" class
>> method only returning 0 on success, I am getting back a positive
>> value (I think the number of bytes returned with the call).
>>
>> That may or may not be how rbd_req_sync_exec() is supposed to
>> behave, but zeroing the return value if successful makes it moot
>> and makes this path through the code work as desired.
>>
>> Do the same in rbd_dev_v2_object_prefix().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> index cf5d109..65e9f1f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> @@ -2169,6 +2169,7 @@ static int rbd_dev_v2_object_prefix(struct
>> rbd_device *rbd_dev)
>> dout("%s: rbd_req_sync_exec returned %d\n", __func__, ret);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto out;
>> + ret = 0; /* rbd_req_sync_exec() can return positive */
>>
>> p = reply_buf;
>> rbd_dev->header.object_prefix = ceph_extract_encoded_string(&p,
>> @@ -2862,6 +2863,7 @@ static int rbd_dev_image_id(struct rbd_device
>> *rbd_dev)
>> dout("%s: rbd_req_sync_exec returned %d\n", __func__, ret);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto out;
>> + ret = 0; /* rbd_req_sync_exec() can return positive */
>>
>> p = response;
>> rbd_dev->image_id = ceph_extract_encoded_string(&p,
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-22 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 16:43 [PATCH 0/2] rbd: two bugs Alex Elder
2012-10-22 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] rbd: zero return code in rbd_dev_image_id() Alex Elder
2012-10-22 17:18 ` Dan Mick
2012-10-22 20:00 ` Dan Mick [this message]
2012-10-24 16:59 ` Josh Durgin
2012-10-22 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] rbd: fix read-only option name Alex Elder
2012-10-24 17:02 ` Josh Durgin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5085A5E8.3020701@inktank.com \
--to=dan.mick@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elder@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox