Re: [PATCH 8/8] rbd: fill rbd_spec in rbd_add_parse_args()

[Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>]

On 10/29/2012 05:30 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 04:03 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
>> Pass the address of an rbd_spec structure to rbd_add_parse_args().
>> Use it to hold the information defining the rbd image to be mapped
>> in an rbd_add() call.
>>
>> Use the result in the caller to initialize the rbd_dev->id field.
>>
>> This means rbd_dev is no longer needed in rbd_add_parse_args(),
>> so get rid of it.
>>
>> Now that this transformation of rbd_add_parse_args() is complete,
>> correct and expand on the its header documentation to reflect the
>> new reality.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/block/rbd.c |  104
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>   1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> index 19c7c6b..28abd31 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c

. . .

>> @@ -2973,15 +3008,15 @@ static int rbd_add_parse_args(struct rbd_device
>> *rbd_dev,
>>       }
>>       *opts = rbd_opts;
>>
>> +    *rbd_spec = spec;
>> +
>>       return 0;
>>   out_mem:
>>       ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +    kfree(spec->image_name);
>> +    kfree(spec->pool_name);
>> +    kfree(spec);
> 
> This is missing spec->snap_name. Why not use rbd_spec_put()?

You're right, and you're right.  It was an oversight.  I'll fix
that.  Do you want me to repost?

In keeping with some of your previous comments I have also added
a note to include in a future patch messages about why a map
request failed in rbd_add() via a log message.

					-Alex

>>   out_err:
>> -    kfree(rbd_dev->spec->image_name);
>> -    rbd_dev->spec->image_name = NULL;
>> -    rbd_dev->spec->image_name_len = 0;
>> -    kfree(rbd_dev->spec->pool_name);
>> -    rbd_dev->spec->pool_name = NULL;
>>       kfree(options);
>>
. . .