CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] rbd: standardize ceph_osd_request variable names
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:08:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <509BBCDD.80309@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509BBC83.1020203@inktank.com>

There are spots where a ceph_osds_request pointer variable is given
the name "req".  Since we're dealing with (at least) three types of
requests (block layer, rbd, and osd), I find this slightly
distracting.

Change such instances to use "osd_req" consistently to make the
abstraction represented a little more obvious.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
---
 drivers/block/rbd.c |   60
++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 9d8b406..caff180 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -1113,12 +1113,12 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
 			  struct ceph_osd_req_op *ops,
 			  struct rbd_req_coll *coll,
 			  int coll_index,
-			  void (*rbd_cb)(struct ceph_osd_request *req,
-					 struct ceph_msg *msg),
+			  void (*rbd_cb)(struct ceph_osd_request *,
+					 struct ceph_msg *),
 			  struct ceph_osd_request **linger_req,
 			  u64 *ver)
 {
-	struct ceph_osd_request *req;
+	struct ceph_osd_request *osd_req;
 	struct ceph_file_layout *layout;
 	int ret;
 	u64 bno;
@@ -1145,67 +1145,68 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
 		(unsigned long long) len, coll, coll_index);

 	osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
-	req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(osdc, flags, snapc, ops,
+	osd_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(osdc, flags, snapc, ops,
 					false, GFP_NOIO, pages, bio);
-	if (!req) {
+	if (!osd_req) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto done_pages;
 	}

-	req->r_callback = rbd_cb;
+	osd_req->r_callback = rbd_cb;

 	rbd_req->rq = rq;
 	rbd_req->bio = bio;
 	rbd_req->pages = pages;
 	rbd_req->len = len;

-	req->r_priv = rbd_req;
+	osd_req->r_priv = rbd_req;

-	reqhead = req->r_request->front.iov_base;
+	reqhead = osd_req->r_request->front.iov_base;
 	reqhead->snapid = cpu_to_le64(CEPH_NOSNAP);

-	strncpy(req->r_oid, object_name, sizeof(req->r_oid));
-	req->r_oid_len = strlen(req->r_oid);
+	strncpy(osd_req->r_oid, object_name, sizeof(osd_req->r_oid));
+	osd_req->r_oid_len = strlen(osd_req->r_oid);

-	layout = &req->r_file_layout;
+	layout = &osd_req->r_file_layout;
 	memset(layout, 0, sizeof(*layout));
 	layout->fl_stripe_unit = cpu_to_le32(1 << RBD_MAX_OBJ_ORDER);
 	layout->fl_stripe_count = cpu_to_le32(1);
 	layout->fl_object_size = cpu_to_le32(1 << RBD_MAX_OBJ_ORDER);
 	layout->fl_pg_pool = cpu_to_le32((int) rbd_dev->spec->pool_id);
 	ret = ceph_calc_raw_layout(osdc, layout, snapid, ofs, &len, &bno,
-				   req, ops);
+				   osd_req, ops);
 	rbd_assert(ret == 0);

-	ceph_osdc_build_request(req, ofs, &len,
+	ceph_osdc_build_request(osd_req, ofs, &len,
 				ops,
 				snapc,
 				&mtime,
-				req->r_oid, req->r_oid_len);
+				osd_req->r_oid, osd_req->r_oid_len);

 	if (linger_req) {
-		ceph_osdc_set_request_linger(osdc, req);
-		*linger_req = req;
+		ceph_osdc_set_request_linger(osdc, osd_req);
+		*linger_req = osd_req;
 	}

-	ret = ceph_osdc_start_request(osdc, req, false);
+	ret = ceph_osdc_start_request(osdc, osd_req, false);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto done_err;

 	if (!rbd_cb) {
-		ret = ceph_osdc_wait_request(osdc, req);
+		u64 version;
+
+		ret = ceph_osdc_wait_request(osdc, osd_req);
+		version = le64_to_cpu(osd_req->r_reassert_version.version);
 		if (ver)
-			*ver = le64_to_cpu(req->r_reassert_version.version);
-		dout("reassert_ver=%llu\n",
-			(unsigned long long)
-				le64_to_cpu(req->r_reassert_version.version));
-		ceph_osdc_put_request(req);
+			*ver = version;
+		dout("reassert_ver=%llu\n", (unsigned long long) version);
+		ceph_osdc_put_request(osd_req);
 	}
 	return ret;

 done_err:
 	bio_chain_put(rbd_req->bio);
-	ceph_osdc_put_request(req);
+	ceph_osdc_put_request(osd_req);
 done_pages:
 	rbd_coll_end_req(rbd_req, ret, len);
 	kfree(rbd_req);
@@ -1215,9 +1216,9 @@ done_pages:
 /*
  * Ceph osd op callback
  */
-static void rbd_req_cb(struct ceph_osd_request *req, struct ceph_msg *msg)
+static void rbd_req_cb(struct ceph_osd_request *osd_req, struct
ceph_msg *msg)
 {
-	struct rbd_request *rbd_req = req->r_priv;
+	struct rbd_request *rbd_req = osd_req->r_priv;
 	struct ceph_osd_reply_head *replyhead;
 	struct ceph_osd_op *op;
 	__s32 rc;
@@ -1248,13 +1249,14 @@ static void rbd_req_cb(struct ceph_osd_request
*req, struct ceph_msg *msg)
 	if (rbd_req->bio)
 		bio_chain_put(rbd_req->bio);

-	ceph_osdc_put_request(req);
+	ceph_osdc_put_request(osd_req);
 	kfree(rbd_req);
 }

-static void rbd_simple_req_cb(struct ceph_osd_request *req, struct
ceph_msg *msg)
+static void rbd_simple_req_cb(struct ceph_osd_request *osd_req,
+				struct ceph_msg *msg)
 {
-	ceph_osdc_put_request(req);
+	ceph_osdc_put_request(osd_req);
 }

 /*
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-08 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-08 14:06 [PATCH 0/3] rbd: a few picky changes Alex Elder
2012-11-08 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] rbd: standardize rbd_request variable names Alex Elder
2012-11-08 14:08 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2012-11-08 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] rbd: be picky about osd request status type Alex Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=509BBCDD.80309@inktank.com \
    --to=elder@inktank.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox