From: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@inktank.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>,
"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: extreme ceph-osd cpu load for rand. 4k write
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:27:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509C23A7.9010109@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509BD87F.1010107@inktank.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1301 bytes --]
Am 08.11.2012 17:06, schrieb Mark Nelson:
> On 11/08/2012 09:45 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Am 08.11.2012 16:01, schrieb Sage Weil:
>>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>> Is there any way to find out why a ceph-osd process takes around 10
>>>> times more
>>>> load on rand 4k writes than on 4k reads?
>>>
>>> Something like perf or oprofile is probably your best bet. perf can be
>>> tedious to deploy, depending on where your kernel is coming from.
>>> oprofile seems to be deprecated, although I've had good results with
>>> it in
>>> the past.
>>
>> I've recorded 10s with perf - it is now a 300MB perf.data file. Sadly
>> i've no idea what todo with it next.
>
> Pour yourself a stiff drink! (haha!)
>
> Try just doing a "perf report" in the directory where you've got the
> data file. Here's a nice tutorial:
>
> https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial
>
> Also, if you see missing symbols you might benefit by chowning the file
> to root and running perf report as root. If you still see missing
> symbols, you may want to just give up and try sysprof.
I've now used google perftools / google CPU profiler. It was the only
tool who worked out of the box ;-)
Attached is a PDF with a profiled ceph-osd process while 4k random write.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: out.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 20834 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-08 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-07 20:41 extreme ceph-osd cpu load for rand. 4k write Stefan Priebe
2012-11-08 14:58 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08 15:01 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-08 15:45 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-08 16:06 ` Mark Nelson
2012-11-08 21:27 ` Stefan Priebe [this message]
2012-11-08 21:50 ` Josh Durgin
2012-11-08 21:58 ` Mark Nelson
2012-11-08 22:06 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-11-08 22:31 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-11-09 10:09 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-09 10:21 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-09 21:21 ` Samuel Just
2012-11-09 21:34 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2012-11-10 20:36 ` Samuel Just
2012-11-10 20:37 ` Samuel Just
2012-11-10 20:43 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-11-10 20:42 ` Stefan Priebe
2012-11-08 15:01 ` Mark Nelson
2012-11-08 15:45 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509C23A7.9010109@profihost.ag \
--to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.nelson@inktank.com \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox