From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: Nick Bartos <nick@pistoncloud.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>, Gregory Farnum <greg@inktank.com>,
Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>,
Mandell Degerness <mandell@pistoncloud.com>,
"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rbd map command hangs for 15 minutes during system start up
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:37:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B7C788.6040404@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPud5_7EckkvSth8+YeGvEph1GxjTqovXhG6gVWKUX-3K9cLjQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/22/2012 12:04 PM, Nick Bartos wrote:
> Here are the ceph log messages (including the libceph kernel debug
> stuff you asked for) from a node boot with the rbd command hung for a
> couple of minutes:
Nick, I have put together a branch that includes two fixes
that might be helpful. I don't expect these fixes will
necessarily *fix* what you're seeing, but one of them
pulls a big hunk of processing out of the picture and
might help eliminate some potential causes. I had to
pull in several other patches as prerequisites in order
to get those fixes to apply cleanly.
Would you be able to give it a try, and let us know what
results you get? The branch contains:
- Linux 3.5.5
- Plus the first 49 patches you listed
- Plus four patches, which are prerequisites...
libceph: define ceph_extract_encoded_string()
rbd: define some new format constants
rbd: define rbd_dev_image_id()
rbd: kill create_snap sysfs entry
- ...for these two bug fixes:
libceph: remove 'osdtimeout' option
ceph: don't reference req after put
The branch is available in the ceph-client git repository
under the name "wip-nick" and has commit id dd9323aa.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client/tree/wip-nick
> https://raw.github.com/gist/4132395/7cb5f0150179b012429c6e57749120dd88616cce/gistfile1.txt
This full debug output is very helpful. Please supply
that again as well.
Thanks.
-Alex
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Nick Bartos <nick@pistoncloud.com> wrote:
>> It's very easy to reproduce now with my automated install script, the
>> most I've seen it succeed with that patch is 2 in a row, and hanging
>> on the 3rd, although it hangs on most builds. So it shouldn't take
>> much to get it to do it again. I'll try and get to that tomorrow,
>> when I'm a bit more rested and my brain is working better.
>>
>> Yes during this the OSDs are probably all syncing up. All the osd and
>> mon daemons have started by the time the rdb commands are ran, though.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Nick Bartos wrote:
>>>> FYI the build which included all 3.5 backports except patch #50 is
>>>> still going strong after 21 builds.
>>>
>>> Okay, that one at least makes some sense. I've opened
>>>
>>> http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3519
>>>
>>> How easy is this to reproduce? If it is something you can trigger with
>>> debugging enabled ('echo module libceph +p >
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control') that would help tremendously.
>>>
>>> I'm guessing that during this startup time the OSDs are still in the
>>> process of starting?
>>>
>>> Alex, I bet that a test that does a lot of map/unmap stuff in a loop while
>>> thrashing OSDs could hit this.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> sage
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Nick Bartos <nick@pistoncloud.com> wrote:
>>>>> With 8 successful installs already done, I'm reasonably confident that
>>>>> it's patch #50. I'm making another build which applies all patches
>>>>> from the 3.5 backport branch, excluding that specific one. I'll let
>>>>> you know if that turns up any unexpected failures.
>>>>>
>>>>> What will the potential fall out be for removing that specific patch?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Nick Bartos <nick@pistoncloud.com> wrote:
>>>>>> It's really looking like it's the
>>>>>> libceph_resubmit_linger_ops_when_pg_mapping_changes commit. When
>>>>>> patches 1-50 (listed below) are applied to 3.5.7, the hang is present.
>>>>>> So far I have gone through 4 successful installs with no hang with
>>>>>> only 1-49 applied. I'm still leaving my test run to make sure it's
>>>>>> not a fluke, but since previously it hangs within the first couple of
>>>>>> builds, it really looks like this is where the problem originated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1-libceph_eliminate_connection_state_DEAD.patch
>>>>>> 2-libceph_kill_bad_proto_ceph_connection_op.patch
>>>>>> 3-libceph_rename_socket_callbacks.patch
>>>>>> 4-libceph_rename_kvec_reset_and_kvec_add_functions.patch
>>>>>> 5-libceph_embed_ceph_messenger_structure_in_ceph_client.patch
>>>>>> 6-libceph_start_separating_connection_flags_from_state.patch
>>>>>> 7-libceph_start_tracking_connection_socket_state.patch
>>>>>> 8-libceph_provide_osd_number_when_creating_osd.patch
>>>>>> 9-libceph_set_CLOSED_state_bit_in_con_init.patch
>>>>>> 10-libceph_embed_ceph_connection_structure_in_mon_client.patch
>>>>>> 11-libceph_drop_connection_refcounting_for_mon_client.patch
>>>>>> 12-libceph_init_monitor_connection_when_opening.patch
>>>>>> 13-libceph_fully_initialize_connection_in_con_init.patch
>>>>>> 14-libceph_tweak_ceph_alloc_msg.patch
>>>>>> 15-libceph_have_messages_point_to_their_connection.patch
>>>>>> 16-libceph_have_messages_take_a_connection_reference.patch
>>>>>> 17-libceph_make_ceph_con_revoke_a_msg_operation.patch
>>>>>> 18-libceph_make_ceph_con_revoke_message_a_msg_op.patch
>>>>>> 19-libceph_fix_overflow_in___decode_pool_names.patch
>>>>>> 20-libceph_fix_overflow_in_osdmap_decode.patch
>>>>>> 21-libceph_fix_overflow_in_osdmap_apply_incremental.patch
>>>>>> 22-libceph_transition_socket_state_prior_to_actual_connect.patch
>>>>>> 23-libceph_fix_NULL_dereference_in_reset_connection.patch
>>>>>> 24-libceph_use_con_get_put_methods.patch
>>>>>> 25-libceph_drop_ceph_con_get_put_helpers_and_nref_member.patch
>>>>>> 26-libceph_encapsulate_out_message_data_setup.patch
>>>>>> 27-libceph_encapsulate_advancing_msg_page.patch
>>>>>> 28-libceph_don_t_mark_footer_complete_before_it_is.patch
>>>>>> 29-libceph_move_init_bio__functions_up.patch
>>>>>> 30-libceph_move_init_of_bio_iter.patch
>>>>>> 31-libceph_don_t_use_bio_iter_as_a_flag.patch
>>>>>> 32-libceph_SOCK_CLOSED_is_a_flag_not_a_state.patch
>>>>>> 33-libceph_don_t_change_socket_state_on_sock_event.patch
>>>>>> 34-libceph_just_set_SOCK_CLOSED_when_state_changes.patch
>>>>>> 35-libceph_don_t_touch_con_state_in_con_close_socket.patch
>>>>>> 36-libceph_clear_CONNECTING_in_ceph_con_close.patch
>>>>>> 37-libceph_clear_NEGOTIATING_when_done.patch
>>>>>> 38-libceph_define_and_use_an_explicit_CONNECTED_state.patch
>>>>>> 39-libceph_separate_banner_and_connect_writes.patch
>>>>>> 40-libceph_distinguish_two_phases_of_connect_sequence.patch
>>>>>> 41-libceph_small_changes_to_messenger.c.patch
>>>>>> 42-libceph_add_some_fine_ASCII_art.patch
>>>>>> 43-libceph_set_peer_name_on_con_open_not_init.patch
>>>>>> 44-libceph_initialize_mon_client_con_only_once.patch
>>>>>> 45-libceph_allow_sock_transition_from_CONNECTING_to_CLOSED.patch
>>>>>> 46-libceph_initialize_msgpool_message_types.patch
>>>>>> 47-libceph_prevent_the_race_of_incoming_work_during_teardown.patch
>>>>>> 48-libceph_report_socket_read_write_error_message.patch
>>>>>> 49-libceph_fix_mutex_coverage_for_ceph_con_close.patch
>>>>>> 50-libceph_resubmit_linger_ops_when_pg_mapping_changes.patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks for hunting this down. I'm very curious what the culprit is...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sage
>>>>
>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-08 22:10 rbd map command hangs for 15 minutes during system start up Mandell Degerness
2012-11-09 1:43 ` Josh Durgin
2012-11-12 22:19 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-12 23:16 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-16 0:21 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-16 0:25 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-16 18:36 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-16 19:16 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-16 22:01 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-16 22:13 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-16 22:16 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-16 22:21 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-19 23:04 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-19 23:34 ` Gregory Farnum
2012-11-20 21:53 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-21 1:31 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-21 16:50 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-21 17:02 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-21 17:34 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-21 21:41 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-22 4:47 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-22 5:49 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-22 18:04 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-29 20:37 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2012-11-30 18:49 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-30 19:10 ` Alex Elder
2012-11-30 19:31 ` Sage Weil
2012-11-30 23:22 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-02 5:34 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-03 4:43 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-10 21:57 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-11 17:26 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-11 18:01 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-11 19:44 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-13 0:57 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-13 19:00 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-13 19:07 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-14 16:46 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-14 16:53 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-14 18:03 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-17 17:12 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-18 16:09 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-18 18:05 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-19 21:25 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-19 22:42 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-20 17:48 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-20 21:59 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-26 17:45 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-26 17:50 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-26 21:36 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-27 17:33 ` Nick Bartos
2012-12-27 18:43 ` Sage Weil
2012-12-27 19:41 ` Alex Elder
2012-12-31 18:22 ` Alex Elder
2013-01-02 15:56 ` Nick Bartos
2012-11-16 22:23 ` Gregory Farnum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B7C788.6040404@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=greg@inktank.com \
--cc=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
--cc=mandell@pistoncloud.com \
--cc=nick@pistoncloud.com \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox