From: James Page <james.page@ubuntu.com>
To: Gary Lowell <gary.lowell@inktank.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Debian packaging question
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:03:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50CAEB73.2070601@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EBEC3BA-3E32-413E-8DBF-5ED7A5FB6F36@inktank.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 14/12/12 04:38, Gary Lowell wrote:
>> I think that the "--debbuildopts '-j8 -b'" might be trouncing
>> the
>>> - --binary-arch flag - I'll get pbuilder setup and give it a
>>> test - I normally use sbuild (for which the packaging changes
>>> did have the desired effect).
>
> I does appear to have been the --debbuildopts causing the problem.
> The combination of your rules file update and removing
> --debbuildopts built just the arch dependent packages.
Good - I'd not managed to actually test this out (I was struggling
with pbuilder).
> Thanks for the help.
No problem
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.page@ubuntu.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/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=oil3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-14 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-11 5:19 Debian packaging question Gary Lowell
2012-12-11 5:34 ` Wido den Hollander
2012-12-11 6:32 ` Gary Lowell
2012-12-11 10:06 ` James Page
2012-12-11 23:00 ` Gary Lowell
2012-12-12 11:04 ` James Page
2012-12-12 15:44 ` Sage Weil
2012-12-12 21:12 ` James Page
2012-12-12 22:17 ` James Page
2012-12-12 23:38 ` Gary Lowell
2012-12-13 9:09 ` James Page
2012-12-14 4:38 ` Gary Lowell
2012-12-14 9:03 ` James Page [this message]
2012-12-11 5:34 ` Sage Weil
2012-12-11 6:38 ` Gary Lowell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50CAEB73.2070601@ubuntu.com \
--to=james.page@ubuntu.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gary.lowell@inktank.com \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
--cc=wido@widodh.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox